Glen Sturtevant
Also served from 2016 to 2020.
Republican
Voting Unity: Republican Caucus
HB1766
Unemployment compensation; increases weekly benefit amounts, report.
-
02/19/2025 - Senate: Reconsideration of Senate passage agreed to by Senate
02/19/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with substitute (27-Y 13-N)Glen Sturtevant:
No
HB1767
Unemployment benefits; maximum duration.
-
02/20/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate as amended
02/20/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendments (30-Y 1-N)Glen Sturtevant:
Yes
HB1769
Chronic student absenteeism; task force to examine its effects on local school divisions, etc.
-
02/19/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute
02/19/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with substitute (37-Y 3-N)Glen Sturtevant:
Yes
HB1775
Divorce; adultery, filing, parties living separate and apart.
-
02/17/2025 - Senate: Read third time
02/17/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (36-Y 2-N)Glen Sturtevant:
Yes
HB1778
Insurance agents; appointments and terminations.
-
02/19/2025 - Senate: Read third time
02/19/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (36-Y 3-N 1-A)Glen Sturtevant:
Yes
HB1799
Virginia Lottery; disclosure of identity of winners.
-
02/10/2025 - Senate: Read third time
02/10/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (35-Y 4-N)Glen Sturtevant:
Yes
HB1802
Small Business and Supplier Diversity, Department of; powers and duties.
-
02/17/2025 - Senate: Passed by for the day
02/18/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (23-Y 17-N)Glen Sturtevant:
No
HB1824
High school graduation requirements; history and social studies credits, etc.
-
02/19/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate as amended
02/19/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendments (24-Y 16-N)Glen Sturtevant:
No
HB1827
Comprehensive plan; social determinants of health.
-
02/12/2025 - Senate: Read third time
02/12/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (22-Y 16-N)Glen Sturtevant:
No
HB1842
Industrial development authorities; Town of Front Royal.
-
02/13/2025 - Senate: Read third time
02/13/2025 - Senate: Defeated by Senate (18-Y 22-N)Glen Sturtevant:
Yes
VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.