House of Delegates District 54

District Index: Leans Republican
Based on 2016 presidential and 2017 gubernatorial results.

Party Performance in Recent Statewide Elections

Ed Gillespie (R)
11,308 57.00%
Mark Warner (D)
8,094 40.80%
Robert Sarvis (L)
438 2.21%

Caroline County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
302 - WOODFORD*
255 (45.78%)
294 (52.78%)
8 (1.44%)
Total for Caroline County
255 (45.78%)
294 (52.78%)
8 (1.44%)

Spotsylvania County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
103 - TRAVELERS REST
726 (57.39%)
503 (39.76%)
36 (2.85%)
104 - MASSAPONAX
700 (60.87%)
426 (37.04%)
24 (2.09%)
202 - WILDERNESS FIRE*
24 (64.86%)
12 (32.43%)
1 (2.70%)
204 - CHANCELLOR
715 (55.34%)
542 (41.95%)
35 (2.71%)
401 - SUMMIT
705 (54.82%)
540 (41.99%)
41 (3.19%)
402 - PARKSIDE
631 (52.76%)
547 (45.74%)
18 (1.51%)
403 - LEE HILL
966 (56.26%)
710 (41.35%)
41 (2.39%)
503 - POST OAK
570 (70.63%)
221 (27.39%)
16 (1.98%)
504 - COURTHOUSE
710 (58.87%)
473 (39.22%)
23 (1.91%)
505 - BROCK
893 (66.89%)
423 (31.69%)
19 (1.42%)
601 - SALEM
753 (55.74%)
559 (41.38%)
39 (2.89%)
602 - SMITH STATION
951 (54.59%)
750 (43.05%)
41 (2.35%)
603 - PIEDMONT
492 (58.29%)
330 (39.10%)
22 (2.61%)
701 - BATTLEFIELD
606 (55.96%)
458 (42.29%)
19 (1.75%)
702 - BRENTS MILL*
334 (54.84%)
257 (42.20%)
18 (2.96%)
703 - FAIRVIEW
297 (48.53%)
298 (48.69%)
17 (2.78%)
704 - GAYLE
980 (55.97%)
751 (42.89%)
20 (1.14%)
Total for Spotsylvania County
11,053 (57.32%)
7,800 (40.45%)
430 (2.23%)

*Because the State Board of Elections does not compile statewide election results by House of Delegates or State Senate districts, VPAP has calculated and estimated the results based on available information. VPAP uses both registered voter lists and spatial analysis to determine how physical voting precincts are related to their districts. When available, VPAP will first use the percentage of registered voters assigned to a precinct that are within a district at the time of the election in order to determine what percentage of votes to apportion to that district. If that historical relationship of a precinct to a district is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use spatial analysis to determine what percentage of a physical precinct's geometric area is within a district in order to determine what percentage of votes to apportion to that district for past statewide results. VPAP may also cross-reference other data sources, such as the Census, to validate and adjust those spatial calculations.

VPAP does not include Central Absentee Precincts or Provisional Precincts in its calculations.