House of Delegates District 66

District Index: Competitive
Based on 2016 presidential and 2017 gubernatorial results.

Party Performance in Recent Statewide Elections

Mark Warner (D)
10,348 48.84%
Ed Gillespie (R)
10,261 48.43%
Robert Sarvis (L)
578 2.73%

Chesterfield County

Precinct Warner (D) Gillespie (R) Sarvis (L)
111 - IRON BRIDGE
974 (45.26%)
1,115 (51.81%)
63 (2.93%)
201 - GATES
420 (41.50%)
556 (54.94%)
36 (3.56%)
203 - BIRD
453 (55.79%)
332 (40.89%)
27 (3.33%)
206 - BELMONT
570 (77.55%)
148 (20.14%)
17 (2.31%)
207 - CHIPPENHAM
312 (68.12%)
135 (29.48%)
11 (2.40%)
209 - SALEM CHURCH*
77 (41.18%)
101 (54.01%)
9 (4.81%)
210 - FIVE FORKS
977 (59.03%)
621 (37.52%)
57 (3.44%)
211 - NASH
660 (31.76%)
1,349 (64.92%)
69 (3.32%)
213 - SOUTHSIDE
1,499 (74.80%)
474 (23.65%)
31 (1.55%)
301 - ETTRICK
1,054 (80.64%)
230 (17.60%)
23 (1.76%)
303 - MATOACA
859 (51.65%)
771 (46.36%)
33 (1.98%)
304 - WINFREES STORE*
213 (27.84%)
529 (69.15%)
23 (3.01%)
305 - BEACH*
330 (34.45%)
600 (62.63%)
28 (2.92%)
515 - DAVIS
855 (77.10%)
235 (21.19%)
19 (1.71%)
Total for Chesterfield County
9,253 (54.77%)
7,196 (42.59%)
446 (2.64%)

Colonial Heights City

Precinct Warner (D) Gillespie (R) Sarvis (L)
001 - FIRST
181 (32.61%)
352 (63.42%)
22 (3.96%)
002 - SECOND
165 (24.41%)
478 (70.71%)
33 (4.88%)
003 - THIRD
238 (27.39%)
604 (69.51%)
27 (3.11%)
004 - FOURTH
275 (26.96%)
724 (70.98%)
21 (2.06%)
005 - FIFTH
236 (20.14%)
907 (77.39%)
29 (2.47%)
Total for Colonial Heights City
1,095 (25.51%)
3,065 (71.41%)
132 (3.08%)

*Because the State Board of Elections does not compile statewide election results by House of Delegates or State Senate districts, VPAP has calculated and estimated the results based on available information. VPAP uses both registered voter lists and spatial analysis to determine how physical voting precincts are related to their districts. When available, VPAP will first use the percentage of registered voters assigned to a precinct that are within a district at the time of the election in order to determine what percentage of votes to apportion to that district. If that historical relationship of a precinct to a district is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use spatial analysis to determine what percentage of a physical precinct's geometric area is within a district in order to determine what percentage of votes to apportion to that district for past statewide results. VPAP may also cross-reference other data sources, such as the Census, to validate and adjust those spatial calculations.

VPAP does not include Central Absentee Precincts or Provisional Precincts in its calculations.