COVID-19 in Virginia

House of Delegates District 76

District Index: Leans Democratic
Based on 2016 presidential and 2017 gubernatorial results.

Party Performance in Recent Statewide Elections

Terry McAuliffe (D)
12,037 55.48%
Ken Cuccinelli (R)
8,645 39.84%
Robert Sarvis (L)
1,015 4.68%

Chesapeake City

Precinct McAuliffe (D) Cuccinelli (R) Sarvis (L)
044 - NANSEMOND
413 (53.50%)
331 (42.88%)
28 (3.63%)
Total for Chesapeake City
413 (53.50%)
331 (42.88%)
28 (3.63%)

Suffolk City

Precinct McAuliffe (D) Cuccinelli (R) Sarvis (L)
101 - BELLEHARBOUR
426 (70.65%)
144 (23.88%)
33 (5.47%)
102 - DRIVER
742 (36.73%)
1,164 (57.62%)
114 (5.64%)
104 - BENNETTS CREEK*
500 (48.45%)
470 (45.54%)
62 (6.01%)
201 - EBENEZER
307 (30.13%)
650 (63.79%)
62 (6.08%)
202 - CHUCKATUCK
375 (39.06%)
533 (55.52%)
52 (5.42%)
203 - KINGS FORK
697 (61.46%)
391 (34.48%)
46 (4.06%)
204 - HILLPOINT
521 (61.88%)
292 (34.68%)
29 (3.44%)
301 - WHITE MARSH
232 (68.04%)
97 (28.45%)
12 (3.52%)
302 - JOHN F KENNEDY
981 (88.38%)
116 (10.45%)
13 (1.17%)
304 - NANSEMOND RIVER
660 (61.51%)
363 (33.83%)
50 (4.66%)
305 - SHOULDERS HILL
250 (57.08%)
166 (37.90%)
22 (5.02%)
401 - AIRPORT
340 (49.13%)
317 (45.81%)
35 (5.06%)
403 - SOUTHSIDE
386 (91.25%)
32 (7.57%)
5 (1.18%)
404 - BOOKER T WASHINGTON
655 (93.44%)
41 (5.85%)
5 (0.71%)
501 - KILBYS MILL
486 (37.56%)
731 (56.49%)
77 (5.95%)
504 - LAKE COHOON
413 (32.34%)
782 (61.24%)
82 (6.42%)
601 - LAKESIDE
608 (55.88%)
412 (37.87%)
68 (6.25%)
602 - OLDE TOWNE
139 (54.72%)
94 (37.01%)
21 (8.27%)
603 - ELEPHANTS FORK/WESTHAVEN
132 (37.08%)
201 (56.46%)
23 (6.46%)
604 - WILROY
300 (42.74%)
364 (51.85%)
38 (5.41%)
605 - HOLLYWOOD
435 (96.88%)
10 (2.23%)
4 (0.89%)
702 - HARBOURVIEW
566 (50.31%)
508 (45.16%)
51 (4.53%)
704 - BURBAGE GRANT
750 (65.16%)
338 (29.37%)
63 (5.47%)
706 - HUNTERSVILLE
723 (85.97%)
98 (11.65%)
20 (2.38%)
Total for Suffolk City
11,624 (55.55%)
8,314 (39.73%)
987 (4.72%)

*Because the State Board of Elections does not compile statewide election results by House of Delegates or State Senate districts, VPAP has calculated and estimated the results based on available information. VPAP uses both registered voter lists and spatial analysis to determine how physical voting precincts are related to their districts. When available, VPAP will first use the percentage of registered voters assigned to a precinct that are within a district at the time of the election in order to determine what percentage of votes to apportion to that district. If that historical relationship of a precinct to a district is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use spatial analysis to determine what percentage of a physical precinct's geometric area is within a district in order to determine what percentage of votes to apportion to that district for past statewide results. VPAP may also cross-reference other data sources, such as the Census, to validate and adjust those spatial calculations.

VPAP does not include Central Absentee Precincts or Provisional Precincts in its calculations.