COVID-19 in Virginia

House of Delegates District 76

District Index: Leans Democratic
Based on 2016 presidential and 2017 gubernatorial results.

Party Performance in Recent Statewide Elections

Ralph Northam (D)
15,362 60.13%
Ed Gillespie (R)
9,931 38.87%
Cliff Hyra (L)
257 1.01%

Chesapeake City

Precinct Northam (D) Gillespie (R) Hyra (L)
044 - NANSEMOND
526 (59.30%)
355 (40.02%)
6 (0.68%)
054 - PUGHSVILLE*
109 (72.67%)
39 (26.00%)
2 (1.33%)
Total for Chesapeake City
635 (61.23%)
394 (37.99%)
8 (0.77%)

Suffolk City

Precinct Northam (D) Gillespie (R) Hyra (L)
101 - BELLEHARBOUR
640 (73.65%)
218 (25.09%)
11 (1.27%)
102 - DRIVER
826 (39.17%)
1,255 (59.51%)
28 (1.33%)
104 - BENNETTS CREEK*
656 (54.08%)
540 (44.52%)
17 (1.40%)
201 - EBENEZER
363 (33.64%)
708 (65.62%)
8 (0.74%)
202 - CHUCKATUCK
408 (40.28%)
595 (58.74%)
10 (0.99%)
203 - KINGS FORK
939 (68.39%)
422 (30.74%)
12 (0.87%)
204 - HILLPOINT
692 (68.11%)
316 (31.10%)
8 (0.79%)
301 - WHITE MARSH
273 (69.82%)
109 (27.88%)
9 (2.30%)
302 - JOHN F KENNEDY
1,112 (89.39%)
121 (9.73%)
11 (0.88%)
304 - NANSEMOND RIVER
877 (66.95%)
416 (31.76%)
17 (1.30%)
305 - SHOULDERS HILL
376 (65.05%)
197 (34.08%)
5 (0.87%)
401 - AIRPORT
321 (45.28%)
379 (53.46%)
9 (1.27%)
403 - SOUTHSIDE
455 (92.11%)
32 (6.48%)
7 (1.42%)
404 - BOOKER T WASHINGTON
841 (93.97%)
47 (5.25%)
7 (0.78%)
501 - KILBYS MILL
598 (41.10%)
845 (58.08%)
12 (0.82%)
504 - LAKE COHOON
463 (32.29%)
961 (67.02%)
10 (0.70%)
601 - LAKESIDE
674 (57.26%)
485 (41.21%)
18 (1.53%)
602 - OLDE TOWNE
173 (60.70%)
107 (37.54%)
5 (1.75%)
603 - ELEPHANTS FORK/WESTHAVEN
200 (50.51%)
194 (48.99%)
2 (0.51%)
604 - WILROY
402 (48.91%)
412 (50.12%)
8 (0.97%)
605 - HOLLYWOOD
448 (95.52%)
18 (3.84%)
3 (0.64%)
702 - HARBOURVIEW
864 (57.83%)
619 (41.43%)
11 (0.74%)
704 - BURBAGE GRANT
992 (71.47%)
383 (27.59%)
13 (0.94%)
706 - HUNTERSVILLE
1,134 (87.23%)
158 (12.15%)
8 (0.62%)
Total for Suffolk City
14,727 (60.08%)
9,537 (38.91%)
249 (1.02%)

*Because the State Board of Elections does not compile statewide election results by House of Delegates or State Senate districts, VPAP has calculated and estimated the results based on available information. VPAP uses both registered voter lists and spatial analysis to determine how physical voting precincts are related to their districts. When available, VPAP will first use the percentage of registered voters assigned to a precinct that are within a district at the time of the election in order to determine what percentage of votes to apportion to that district. If that historical relationship of a precinct to a district is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use spatial analysis to determine what percentage of a physical precinct's geometric area is within a district in order to determine what percentage of votes to apportion to that district for past statewide results. VPAP may also cross-reference other data sources, such as the Census, to validate and adjust those spatial calculations.

VPAP does not include Central Absentee Precincts or Provisional Precincts in its calculations.