COVID-19 in Virginia

State Senate District 16

District Index: Strong Democratic
Based on 2016 presidential and 2017 gubernatorial results.

Party Performance in Recent Statewide Elections

Mark Warner (D)
27,976 68.55%
Ed Gillespie (R)
11,843 29.02%
Robert Sarvis (L)
991 2.43%

Chesterfield County

Precinct Warner (D) Gillespie (R) Sarvis (L)
101 - BELLWOOD
290 (44.14%)
342 (52.05%)
25 (3.81%)
103 - ENON
527 (35.42%)
914 (61.42%)
47 (3.16%)
105 - DREWRYS BLUFF
435 (53.64%)
347 (42.79%)
29 (3.58%)
106 - HARROWGATE
985 (52.12%)
839 (44.39%)
66 (3.49%)
109 - ELIZABETH SCOTT
878 (44.80%)
1,041 (53.11%)
41 (2.09%)
110 - DUTCH GAP
427 (47.23%)
447 (49.45%)
30 (3.32%)
112 - CARVER
593 (50.17%)
546 (46.19%)
43 (3.64%)
214 - HOPKINS
140 (80.00%)
28 (16.00%)
7 (4.00%)
301 - ETTRICK
1,054 (80.64%)
230 (17.60%)
23 (1.76%)
303 - MATOACA
859 (51.65%)
771 (46.36%)
33 (1.98%)
Total for Chesterfield County
6,188 (51.41%)
5,505 (45.73%)
344 (2.86%)

Dinwiddie County

Precinct Warner (D) Gillespie (R) Sarvis (L)
201 - ROHOIC*
147 (53.45%)
124 (45.09%)
4 (1.45%)
202 - SUTHERLAND*
382 (42.16%)
506 (55.85%)
18 (1.99%)
302 - NEW HOPE*
194 (39.27%)
297 (60.12%)
3 (0.61%)
501 - EDGEHILL
91 (72.80%)
32 (25.60%)
2 (1.60%)
502 - CHESDIN
664 (69.46%)
268 (28.03%)
24 (2.51%)
Total for Dinwiddie County
1,478 (53.63%)
1,227 (44.52%)
51 (1.85%)

Hopewell City

Precinct Warner (D) Gillespie (R) Sarvis (L)
101 - WARD ONE
262 (45.88%)
287 (50.26%)
22 (3.85%)
201 - WARD TWO
374 (89.47%)
41 (9.81%)
3 (0.72%)
301 - WARD THREE
266 (29.17%)
624 (68.42%)
22 (2.41%)
401 - WARD FOUR
440 (47.11%)
462 (49.46%)
32 (3.43%)
501 - WARD FIVE
225 (34.67%)
393 (60.55%)
31 (4.78%)
601 - WARD SIX
433 (86.77%)
57 (11.42%)
9 (1.80%)
701 - WARD SEVEN
327 (61.12%)
198 (37.01%)
10 (1.87%)
Total for Hopewell City
2,327 (51.51%)
2,062 (45.64%)
129 (2.86%)

Petersburg City

Precinct Warner (D) Gillespie (R) Sarvis (L)
101 - FIRST WARD FIRST PRECINCT
590 (87.67%)
72 (10.70%)
11 (1.63%)
201 - SECOND WARD FIRST PRECINCT
1,085 (89.82%)
109 (9.02%)
14 (1.16%)
301 - THIRD WARD FIRST PRECINCT
1,101 (78.25%)
282 (20.04%)
24 (1.71%)
401 - FOURTH WARD FIRST PRECINCT
748 (86.08%)
108 (12.43%)
13 (1.50%)
501 - FIFTH WARD FIRST PRECINCT
680 (92.77%)
40 (5.46%)
13 (1.77%)
601 - SIXTH WARD FIRST PRECINCT
763 (97.82%)
13 (1.67%)
4 (0.51%)
701 - SEVENTH WARD FIRST PRECINCT
1,008 (90.89%)
95 (8.57%)
6 (0.54%)
Total for Petersburg City
5,975 (88.14%)
719 (10.61%)
85 (1.25%)

Prince George County

Precinct Warner (D) Gillespie (R) Sarvis (L)
103 - UNION BRANCH
470 (48.06%)
476 (48.67%)
32 (3.27%)
104 - RIVES
348 (57.81%)
235 (39.04%)
19 (3.16%)
204 - COURTS BLDG
592 (50.17%)
563 (47.71%)
25 (2.12%)
205 - JEFFERSON PARK
431 (67.24%)
198 (30.89%)
12 (1.87%)
Total for Prince George County
1,841 (54.13%)
1,472 (43.28%)
88 (2.59%)

Richmond City

Precinct Warner (D) Gillespie (R) Sarvis (L)
509 - FIVE HUNDRED NINE
566 (90.71%)
39 (6.25%)
19 (3.04%)
510 - FIVE HUNDRED TEN
688 (91.37%)
38 (5.05%)
27 (3.59%)
609 - SIX HUNDRED NINE
422 (89.60%)
39 (8.28%)
10 (2.12%)
610 - SIX HUNDRED TEN
443 (98.01%)
5 (1.11%)
4 (0.88%)
701 - SEVEN HUNDRED ONE
463 (95.86%)
11 (2.28%)
9 (1.86%)
702 - SEVEN HUNDRED TWO
473 (91.31%)
26 (5.02%)
19 (3.67%)
703 - SEVEN HUNDRED THREE
499 (94.69%)
20 (3.80%)
8 (1.52%)
705 - SEVEN HUNDRED FIVE
473 (87.27%)
43 (7.93%)
26 (4.80%)
706 - SEVEN HUNDRED SIX
846 (90.87%)
59 (6.34%)
26 (2.79%)
707 - SEVEN HUNDRED SEVEN
1,012 (81.09%)
172 (13.78%)
64 (5.13%)
708 - SEVEN HUNDRED EIGHT*
309 (77.64%)
68 (17.09%)
21 (5.28%)
802 - EIGHT HUNDRED TWO
488 (96.25%)
11 (2.17%)
8 (1.58%)
806 - EIGHT HUNDRED SIX
644 (90.58%)
59 (8.30%)
8 (1.13%)
810 - EIGHT HUNDRED TEN
518 (91.68%)
36 (6.37%)
11 (1.95%)
811 - EIGHT HUNDRED ELEVEN
574 (90.68%)
48 (7.58%)
11 (1.74%)
812 - EIGHT HUNDRED TWELVE
924 (85.71%)
137 (12.71%)
17 (1.58%)
814 - EIGHT HUNDRED FOURTEEN
565 (94.80%)
26 (4.36%)
5 (0.84%)
902 - NINE HUNDRED TWO
260 (92.20%)
21 (7.45%)
1 (0.35%)
Total for Richmond City
10,167 (89.82%)
858 (7.58%)
294 (2.60%)

*Because the State Board of Elections does not compile statewide election results by House of Delegates or State Senate districts, VPAP has calculated and estimated the results based on available information. VPAP uses both registered voter lists and spatial analysis to determine how physical voting precincts are related to their districts. When available, VPAP will first use the percentage of registered voters assigned to a precinct that are within a district at the time of the election in order to determine what percentage of votes to apportion to that district. If that historical relationship of a precinct to a district is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use spatial analysis to determine what percentage of a physical precinct's geometric area is within a district in order to determine what percentage of votes to apportion to that district for past statewide results. VPAP may also cross-reference other data sources, such as the Census, to validate and adjust those spatial calculations.

VPAP does not include Central Absentee Precincts or Provisional Precincts in its calculations.