State Senate District 28

District Index: Leans Republican
Based on 2016 presidential and 2017 gubernatorial results.

Party Performance in Recent Statewide Elections

Ed Gillespie (R)
31,838 59.62%
Mark Warner (D)
20,374 38.15%
Robert Sarvis (L)
1,193 2.23%

King George County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
101 - COURTHOUSE*
202 (63.52%)
108 (33.96%)
8 (2.52%)
102 - PASSAPATANZY
349 (61.01%)
215 (37.59%)
8 (1.40%)
201 - MONROE
1,102 (65.79%)
521 (31.10%)
52 (3.10%)
301 - DAHLGREN
840 (55.67%)
633 (41.95%)
36 (2.39%)
401 - SHILOH*
467 (60.10%)
288 (37.07%)
22 (2.83%)
Total for King George County
2,960 (61.02%)
1,765 (36.38%)
126 (2.60%)

Prince William County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
101 - BRENTSVILLE
771 (73.29%)
259 (24.62%)
22 (2.09%)
102 - CEDAR POINT*
811 (56.83%)
571 (40.01%)
45 (3.15%)
104 - NOKESVILLE*
490 (67.68%)
215 (29.70%)
19 (2.62%)
110 - BUCKLAND MILLS*
210 (54.12%)
168 (43.30%)
10 (2.58%)
112 - BURKE-NICKENS
566 (52.75%)
478 (44.55%)
29 (2.70%)
202 - MARSHALL
881 (60.63%)
519 (35.72%)
53 (3.65%)
203 - BENNETT
778 (57.84%)
537 (39.93%)
30 (2.23%)
206 - COLES*
495 (59.42%)
315 (37.82%)
23 (2.76%)
208 - HYLTON*
312 (65.55%)
156 (32.77%)
8 (1.68%)
209 - INDEPENDENT HILL
619 (67.14%)
284 (30.80%)
19 (2.06%)
214 - LUCASVILLE
503 (64.99%)
253 (32.69%)
18 (2.33%)
310 - FOREST PARK*
1 (50.00%)
1 (50.00%)
0 (0.00%)
401 - EVERGREEN*
283 (63.88%)
145 (32.73%)
15 (3.39%)
403 - BULL RUN*
166 (54.97%)
131 (43.38%)
5 (1.66%)
406 - ALVEY
480 (54.86%)
392 (44.80%)
3 (0.34%)
409 - HAYMARKET*
6 (60.00%)
4 (40.00%)
0 (0.00%)
410 - MOUNTAIN VIEW
875 (61.27%)
514 (35.99%)
39 (2.73%)
413 - REAGAN
855 (61.69%)
514 (37.09%)
17 (1.23%)
Total for Prince William County
9,102 (61.03%)
5,456 (36.59%)
355 (2.38%)

Spotsylvania County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
202 - WILDERNESS FIRE
654 (63.99%)
331 (32.39%)
37 (3.62%)
203 - NI RIVER - ELYS FORD*
350 (70.28%)
136 (27.31%)
12 (2.41%)
303 - RIVERBEND*
1,092 (63.93%)
590 (34.54%)
26 (1.52%)
505 - BROCK*
557 (66.87%)
264 (31.69%)
12 (1.44%)
Total for Spotsylvania County
2,653 (65.33%)
1,321 (32.53%)
87 (2.14%)

Stafford County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
101 - HARTWOOD*
24 (68.57%)
10 (28.57%)
1 (2.86%)
102 - ROCKY RUN
519 (53.89%)
429 (44.55%)
15 (1.56%)
103 - SIMPSON
680 (64.27%)
357 (33.74%)
21 (1.98%)
104 - COLLEGE*
785 (61.71%)
460 (36.16%)
27 (2.12%)
201 - ROCK HILL*
398 (61.14%)
241 (37.02%)
12 (1.84%)
202 - ROSEVILLE
862 (58.76%)
566 (38.58%)
39 (2.66%)
203 - RUBY*
210 (72.41%)
73 (25.17%)
7 (2.41%)
204 - STEFANIGA
1,020 (63.75%)
561 (35.06%)
19 (1.19%)
301 - GRIFFIS*
114 (42.38%)
148 (55.02%)
7 (2.60%)
303 - HARBOUR
591 (63.21%)
319 (34.12%)
25 (2.67%)
401 - AQUIA
136 (39.77%)
199 (58.19%)
7 (2.05%)
402 - COURTHOUSE
646 (44.07%)
786 (53.62%)
34 (2.32%)
403 - BROOKE
983 (62.93%)
548 (35.08%)
31 (1.98%)
404 - GOVERNMENT ISLAND
748 (62.39%)
427 (35.61%)
24 (2.00%)
501 - GRAFTON
1,048 (63.13%)
572 (34.46%)
40 (2.41%)
502 - FALMOUTH
711 (56.88%)
515 (41.20%)
24 (1.92%)
503 - DREW
576 (58.72%)
380 (38.74%)
25 (2.55%)
504 - GAYLE
546 (48.02%)
582 (51.19%)
9 (0.79%)
601 - FERRY FARM
785 (62.90%)
429 (34.38%)
34 (2.72%)
602 - CHATHAM
796 (57.18%)
563 (40.45%)
33 (2.37%)
603 - WHITE OAK
900 (65.60%)
424 (30.90%)
48 (3.50%)
604 - ENGLAND RUN
171 (39.86%)
248 (57.81%)
10 (2.33%)
701 - WOODLANDS
893 (55.95%)
683 (42.79%)
20 (1.25%)
702 - WHITSON
544 (49.77%)
522 (47.76%)
27 (2.47%)
703 - HAMPTON
997 (58.41%)
684 (40.07%)
26 (1.52%)
Total for Stafford County
15,683 (58.14%)
10,726 (39.76%)
565 (2.09%)

Westmoreland County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
201 - PRECINCT 2-1*
122 (51.05%)
113 (47.28%)
4 (1.67%)
301 - PRECINCT 3-1*
355 (51.37%)
323 (46.74%)
13 (1.88%)
401 - PRECINCT 4-1
508 (64.71%)
253 (32.23%)
24 (3.06%)
501 - PRECINCT 5-1
455 (51.07%)
417 (46.80%)
19 (2.13%)
Total for Westmoreland County
1,440 (55.26%)
1,106 (42.44%)
60 (2.30%)

*Because the State Board of Elections does not compile statewide election results by House of Delegates or State Senate districts, VPAP has calculated and estimated the results based on available information. VPAP uses both registered voter lists and spatial analysis to determine how physical voting precincts are related to their districts. When available, VPAP will first use the percentage of registered voters assigned to a precinct that are within a district at the time of the election in order to determine what percentage of votes to apportion to that district. If that historical relationship of a precinct to a district is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use spatial analysis to determine what percentage of a physical precinct's geometric area is within a district in order to determine what percentage of votes to apportion to that district for past statewide results. VPAP may also cross-reference other data sources, such as the Census, to validate and adjust those spatial calculations.

VPAP does not include Central Absentee Precincts or Provisional Precincts in its calculations.