COVID-19 in Virginia

State Senate District 4

District Index: Strong Republican
Based on 2016 presidential and 2017 gubernatorial results.

Party Performance in Recent Statewide Elections

Ed Gillespie (R)
38,118 59.90%
Mark Warner (D)
23,790 37.39%
Robert Sarvis (L)
1,726 2.71%

Caroline County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
101 - BOWLING GREEN
431 (60.45%)
266 (37.31%)
16 (2.24%)
102 - SPARTA
280 (52.53%)
246 (46.15%)
7 (1.31%)
201 - NORTH MADISON
241 (47.63%)
257 (50.79%)
8 (1.58%)
202 - SOUTH MADISON
341 (50.15%)
321 (47.21%)
18 (2.65%)
301 - PORT ROYAL
190 (54.13%)
152 (43.30%)
9 (2.56%)
302 - WOODFORD
361 (45.75%)
416 (52.72%)
12 (1.52%)
401 - DAWN
351 (33.33%)
691 (65.62%)
11 (1.04%)
402 - CARMEL CHURCH
107 (29.48%)
247 (68.04%)
9 (2.48%)
501 - WEST MATTAPONI
268 (39.76%)
391 (58.01%)
15 (2.23%)
502 - MILFORD
270 (49.63%)
263 (48.35%)
11 (2.02%)
601 - CHILESBURG
275 (46.45%)
290 (48.99%)
27 (4.56%)
602 - LAKE
233 (54.31%)
177 (41.26%)
19 (4.43%)
Total for Caroline County
3,348 (46.33%)
3,717 (51.43%)
162 (2.24%)

Essex County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
101 - GREATER TAPPAHANNOCK
343 (52.69%)
294 (45.16%)
14 (2.15%)
201 - NORTH
219 (33.18%)
429 (65.00%)
12 (1.82%)
301 - SOUTH
488 (61.54%)
287 (36.19%)
18 (2.27%)
401 - CENTRAL
405 (56.02%)
305 (42.19%)
13 (1.80%)
Total for Essex County
1,455 (51.47%)
1,315 (46.52%)
57 (2.02%)

Hanover County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
104 - SLIDING HILL
588 (56.05%)
420 (40.04%)
41 (3.91%)
106 - KERSEY CREEK
411 (62.27%)
224 (33.94%)
25 (3.79%)
107 - CHICKAHOMINY
562 (62.79%)
302 (33.74%)
31 (3.46%)
201 - BEAVERDAM
954 (69.13%)
376 (27.25%)
50 (3.62%)
202 - BLUNTS
394 (55.81%)
288 (40.79%)
24 (3.40%)
206 - COURTHOUSE
367 (56.20%)
261 (39.97%)
25 (3.83%)
208 - OAK KNOLL
602 (64.39%)
296 (31.66%)
37 (3.96%)
301 - CLAY
905 (67.94%)
386 (28.98%)
41 (3.08%)
303 - SHADY GROVE
794 (67.40%)
346 (29.37%)
38 (3.23%)
304 - ATLEE
1,348 (62.12%)
728 (33.55%)
94 (4.33%)
305 - COOL SPRING
803 (62.39%)
443 (34.42%)
41 (3.19%)
401 - BATTLEFIELD
1,048 (74.27%)
331 (23.46%)
32 (2.27%)
403 - COLD HARBOR
1,107 (68.08%)
474 (29.15%)
45 (2.77%)
404 - BLACK CREEK
1,129 (77.43%)
305 (20.92%)
24 (1.65%)
405 - PEBBLE CREEK
497 (63.64%)
261 (33.42%)
23 (2.94%)
406 - BEAVERDAM CREEK
164 (63.08%)
77 (29.62%)
19 (7.31%)
502 - RURAL POINT
815 (66.97%)
367 (30.16%)
35 (2.88%)
503 - NEWMAN
592 (60.16%)
329 (33.43%)
63 (6.40%)
504 - STUDLEY
641 (76.77%)
156 (18.68%)
38 (4.55%)
505 - TOTOPOTOMOY
508 (73.94%)
164 (23.87%)
15 (2.18%)
506 - GEORGETOWN
653 (69.54%)
258 (27.48%)
28 (2.98%)
507 - LAUREL MEADOW
732 (67.53%)
313 (28.87%)
39 (3.60%)
601 - VILLAGE
1,264 (70.18%)
483 (26.82%)
54 (3.00%)
602 - LEE DAVIS
862 (69.13%)
350 (28.07%)
35 (2.81%)
603 - MECHANICSVILLE
456 (59.14%)
290 (37.61%)
25 (3.24%)
604 - HANOVER GROVE
558 (66.91%)
255 (30.58%)
21 (2.52%)
Total for Hanover County
18,754 (66.55%)
8,483 (30.10%)
943 (3.35%)

King George County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
101 - COURTHOUSE*
500 (63.45%)
267 (33.88%)
21 (2.66%)
401 - SHILOH*
449 (60.19%)
276 (37.00%)
21 (2.82%)
Total for King George County
949 (61.86%)
543 (35.40%)
42 (2.74%)

Lancaster County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
101 - PRECINCT 1-1
514 (59.49%)
335 (38.77%)
15 (1.74%)
201 - PRECINCT 2-1
298 (43.38%)
373 (54.29%)
16 (2.33%)
301 - PRECINCT 3-1
453 (65.37%)
227 (32.76%)
13 (1.88%)
302 - PRECINCT 3-2
193 (63.07%)
102 (33.33%)
11 (3.59%)
401 - PRECINCT 4-1
252 (38.24%)
397 (60.24%)
10 (1.52%)
501 - PRECINCT 5-1
653 (64.46%)
340 (33.56%)
20 (1.97%)
Total for Lancaster County
2,363 (55.97%)
1,774 (42.02%)
85 (2.01%)

Middlesex County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
101 - SALUDA
147 (56.54%)
109 (41.92%)
4 (1.54%)
102 - URBANNA
299 (60.77%)
176 (35.77%)
17 (3.46%)
201 - NEW MARKET
594 (71.05%)
225 (26.91%)
17 (2.03%)
301 - WATERVIEW
136 (48.92%)
131 (47.12%)
11 (3.96%)
302 - CHURCH VIEW
152 (45.65%)
175 (52.55%)
6 (1.80%)
401 - HARMONY VILLAGE
335 (53.86%)
270 (43.41%)
17 (2.73%)
501 - WILTON
504 (65.54%)
251 (32.64%)
14 (1.82%)
Total for Middlesex County
2,167 (60.36%)
1,337 (37.24%)
86 (2.40%)

Northumberland County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
101 - 1A
414 (55.35%)
309 (41.31%)
25 (3.34%)
201 - 2A
552 (61.68%)
320 (35.75%)
23 (2.57%)
301 - 3A
158 (32.78%)
311 (64.52%)
13 (2.70%)
302 - 3B
54 (22.41%)
186 (77.18%)
1 (0.41%)
401 - 4A
784 (63.33%)
433 (34.98%)
21 (1.70%)
501 - 5A
748 (65.44%)
384 (33.60%)
11 (0.96%)
Total for Northumberland County
2,710 (57.09%)
1,943 (40.93%)
94 (1.98%)

Richmond County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
101 - PRECINCT 1-1
152 (33.33%)
295 (64.69%)
9 (1.97%)
201 - PRECINCT 2-1
244 (70.52%)
94 (27.17%)
8 (2.31%)
301 - PRECINCT 3-1
242 (60.96%)
152 (38.29%)
3 (0.76%)
401 - PRECINCT 4-1
230 (60.69%)
143 (37.73%)
6 (1.58%)
501 - PRECINCT 5-1
279 (66.11%)
133 (31.52%)
10 (2.37%)
Total for Richmond County
1,147 (57.35%)
817 (40.85%)
36 (1.80%)

Spotsylvania County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
101 - PARTLOW
583 (68.11%)
248 (28.97%)
25 (2.92%)
102 - BLAYDES CORNER
572 (66.82%)
265 (30.96%)
19 (2.22%)
103 - TRAVELERS REST*
628 (57.40%)
435 (39.76%)
31 (2.83%)
104 - MASSAPONAX
700 (60.87%)
426 (37.04%)
24 (2.09%)
401 - SUMMIT
705 (54.82%)
540 (41.99%)
41 (3.19%)
402 - PARKSIDE*
300 (52.72%)
260 (45.69%)
9 (1.58%)
403 - LEE HILL
966 (56.26%)
710 (41.35%)
41 (2.39%)
701 - BATTLEFIELD*
72 (56.25%)
54 (42.19%)
2 (1.56%)
702 - BRENTS MILL*
6 (60.00%)
4 (40.00%)
0 (0.00%)
Total for Spotsylvania County
4,532 (59.12%)
2,942 (38.38%)
192 (2.50%)

Westmoreland County

Precinct Gillespie (R) Warner (D) Sarvis (L)
101 - PRECINCT 1-1
177 (31.11%)
382 (67.14%)
10 (1.76%)
102 - PRECINCT 1-2
122 (41.08%)
171 (57.58%)
4 (1.35%)
201 - PRECINCT 2-1*
379 (50.87%)
352 (47.25%)
14 (1.88%)
301 - PRECINCT 3-1*
15 (50.00%)
14 (46.67%)
1 (3.33%)
Total for Westmoreland County
693 (42.23%)
919 (56.00%)
29 (1.77%)

*Because the State Board of Elections does not compile statewide election results by House of Delegates or State Senate districts, VPAP has calculated and estimated the results based on available information. VPAP uses both registered voter lists and spatial analysis to determine how physical voting precincts are related to their districts. When available, VPAP will first use the percentage of registered voters assigned to a precinct that are within a district at the time of the election in order to determine what percentage of votes to apportion to that district. If that historical relationship of a precinct to a district is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use spatial analysis to determine what percentage of a physical precinct's geometric area is within a district in order to determine what percentage of votes to apportion to that district for past statewide results. VPAP may also cross-reference other data sources, such as the Census, to validate and adjust those spatial calculations.

VPAP does not include Central Absentee Precincts or Provisional Precincts in its calculations.