Election Results
Sponsored by
House District 61
Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|
Republican Candidate
Tommy Wright* (Incumbent)
Winner
|
20,976 | 67.47% |
Democrat Candidate
Trudy Berry
|
9,418 | 30.29% |
Libertarian Candidate
Joe Paschal
|
675 | 2.17% |
5 of 5 localities complete (100.0%)
Wright
Berry
Election Day Results
Additional Mail Results
Provisional Ballots
Total
20,958
14
4
20,976
9,376
30
12
9,418
Additional Mail Ballots by Locality
>+20D
0 to +20D
0 to +20R
>+20R
A map displaying precinct-level results.
This map displays only votes cast on Election Day, and does not include
early ballots.
Amelia County
9 of 9 precincts reporting
0 estimated early votes outstanding
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
4,709 | 74.73% |
Berry |
|
1,498 | 23.77% |
Paschal |
|
88 | 1.40% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
1,392 | 71.57% |
Berry |
|
536 | 27.56% |
Paschal |
|
16 | 0.82% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
153 | 59.30% |
Wright |
|
101 | 39.15% |
Paschal |
|
4 | 1.55% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
7 | 53.85% |
Wright |
|
6 | 46.15% |
Paschal |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
4 | 100.00% |
Wright |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Paschal |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
599 | 81.28% |
Berry |
|
124 | 16.82% |
Paschal |
|
13 | 1.76% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
663 | 78.65% |
Berry |
|
164 | 19.45% |
Paschal |
|
15 | 1.78% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
640 | 80.60% |
Berry |
|
137 | 17.25% |
Paschal |
|
16 | 2.02% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
574 | 81.53% |
Berry |
|
119 | 16.90% |
Paschal |
|
11 | 1.56% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
734 | 73.18% |
Berry |
|
254 | 25.32% |
Paschal |
|
13 | 1.30% |
Cumberland County
9 of 9 precincts reporting
0 estimated early votes outstanding
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
2,668 | 63.90% |
Berry |
|
1,453 | 34.80% |
Paschal |
|
53 | 1.27% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
505 | 54.13% |
Berry |
|
419 | 44.91% |
Paschal |
|
9 | 0.96% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
145 | 64.73% |
Wright |
|
77 | 34.38% |
Paschal |
|
2 | 0.89% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
2 | 66.67% |
Wright |
|
1 | 33.33% |
Paschal |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
1 | 100.00% |
Wright |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Paschal |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
540 | 72.48% |
Berry |
|
194 | 26.04% |
Paschal |
|
11 | 1.48% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
442 | 74.79% |
Berry |
|
135 | 22.84% |
Paschal |
|
14 | 2.37% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
284 | 58.68% |
Berry |
|
196 | 40.50% |
Paschal |
|
4 | 0.83% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
465 | 74.88% |
Berry |
|
150 | 24.15% |
Paschal |
|
6 | 0.97% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
354 | 61.78% |
Berry |
|
211 | 36.82% |
Paschal |
|
7 | 1.22% |
Lunenburg County
14 of 14 precincts reporting
0 estimated early votes outstanding
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
2,267 | 69.05% |
Berry |
|
935 | 28.48% |
Paschal |
|
79 | 2.41% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
517 | 61.18% |
Berry |
|
301 | 35.62% |
Paschal |
|
27 | 3.20% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
138 | 71.13% |
Wright |
|
55 | 28.35% |
Paschal |
|
1 | 0.52% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
1 | 50.00% |
Berry |
|
1 | 50.00% |
Paschal |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Berry |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Paschal |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
269 | 84.59% |
Berry |
|
38 | 11.95% |
Paschal |
|
10 | 3.14% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
199 | 77.13% |
Berry |
|
51 | 19.77% |
Paschal |
|
8 | 3.10% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
42 | 91.30% |
Berry |
|
3 | 6.52% |
Paschal |
|
1 | 2.17% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
231 | 75.99% |
Berry |
|
63 | 20.72% |
Paschal |
|
9 | 2.96% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
170 | 84.16% |
Berry |
|
27 | 13.37% |
Paschal |
|
5 | 2.48% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
284 | 79.55% |
Berry |
|
66 | 18.49% |
Paschal |
|
7 | 1.96% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
111 | 64.16% |
Berry |
|
60 | 34.68% |
Paschal |
|
2 | 1.16% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
84 | 50.00% |
Wright |
|
80 | 47.62% |
Paschal |
|
4 | 2.38% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
147 | 67.74% |
Berry |
|
68 | 31.34% |
Paschal |
|
2 | 0.92% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
161 | 80.90% |
Berry |
|
35 | 17.59% |
Paschal |
|
3 | 1.51% |
Mecklenburg County
27 of 27 precincts reporting
0 estimated early votes outstanding
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
7,826 | 65.42% |
Berry |
|
3,804 | 31.80% |
Paschal |
|
326 | 2.73% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
1,757 | 66.78% |
Berry |
|
818 | 31.09% |
Paschal |
|
56 | 2.13% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
467 | 60.89% |
Wright |
|
280 | 36.51% |
Paschal |
|
20 | 2.61% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
16 | 76.19% |
Wright |
|
4 | 19.05% |
Paschal |
|
1 | 4.76% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
7 | 63.64% |
Wright |
|
4 | 36.36% |
Paschal |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
215 | 57.64% |
Berry |
|
148 | 39.68% |
Paschal |
|
9 | 2.41% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
120 | 80.00% |
Berry |
|
26 | 17.33% |
Paschal |
|
4 | 2.67% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
299 | 58.97% |
Berry |
|
191 | 37.67% |
Paschal |
|
17 | 3.35% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
154 | 58.56% |
Berry |
|
101 | 38.40% |
Paschal |
|
8 | 3.04% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
60 | 52.17% |
Wright |
|
52 | 45.22% |
Paschal |
|
3 | 2.61% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
137 | 72.11% |
Wright |
|
44 | 23.16% |
Paschal |
|
9 | 4.74% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
575 | 79.75% |
Berry |
|
129 | 17.89% |
Paschal |
|
17 | 2.36% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
308 | 71.30% |
Berry |
|
115 | 26.62% |
Paschal |
|
9 | 2.08% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
390 | 54.09% |
Wright |
|
312 | 43.27% |
Paschal |
|
17 | 2.36% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
72 | 50.00% |
Wright |
|
70 | 48.61% |
Paschal |
|
2 | 1.39% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
591 | 68.09% |
Berry |
|
263 | 30.30% |
Paschal |
|
14 | 1.61% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
270 | 73.37% |
Berry |
|
81 | 22.01% |
Paschal |
|
16 | 4.35% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
223 | 89.20% |
Berry |
|
24 | 9.60% |
Paschal |
|
3 | 1.20% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
140 | 71.07% |
Berry |
|
48 | 24.37% |
Paschal |
|
9 | 4.57% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
194 | 76.38% |
Berry |
|
59 | 23.23% |
Paschal |
|
1 | 0.39% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
275 | 65.32% |
Berry |
|
125 | 29.69% |
Paschal |
|
21 | 4.99% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
270 | 69.77% |
Berry |
|
103 | 26.61% |
Paschal |
|
14 | 3.62% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
101 | 67.33% |
Berry |
|
39 | 26.00% |
Paschal |
|
9 | 6.00% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
329 | 80.84% |
Berry |
|
64 | 15.72% |
Paschal |
|
14 | 3.44% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
233 | 70.18% |
Berry |
|
86 | 25.90% |
Paschal |
|
13 | 3.92% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
138 | 88.46% |
Berry |
|
10 | 6.41% |
Paschal |
|
8 | 5.13% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
217 | 78.62% |
Berry |
|
48 | 17.39% |
Paschal |
|
9 | 3.26% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
651 | 76.50% |
Berry |
|
177 | 20.80% |
Paschal |
|
23 | 2.70% |
Nottoway County
13 of 13 precincts reporting
0 estimated early votes outstanding
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
3,506 | 65.33% |
Berry |
|
1,728 | 32.20% |
Paschal |
|
129 | 2.40% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
1,031 | 62.52% |
Berry |
|
591 | 35.84% |
Paschal |
|
27 | 1.64% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
149 | 56.44% |
Wright |
|
110 | 41.67% |
Paschal |
|
5 | 1.89% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
4 | 66.67% |
Wright |
|
2 | 33.33% |
Paschal |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Berry |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Paschal |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
311 | 73.35% |
Berry |
|
95 | 22.41% |
Paschal |
|
18 | 4.25% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
236 | 73.29% |
Berry |
|
77 | 23.91% |
Paschal |
|
8 | 2.48% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
362 | 70.43% |
Berry |
|
128 | 24.90% |
Paschal |
|
22 | 4.28% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
198 | 79.20% |
Berry |
|
45 | 18.00% |
Paschal |
|
6 | 2.40% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
175 | 54.69% |
Berry |
|
140 | 43.75% |
Paschal |
|
5 | 1.56% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
193 | 77.20% |
Berry |
|
51 | 20.40% |
Paschal |
|
6 | 2.40% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Berry |
|
179 | 65.57% |
Wright |
|
90 | 32.97% |
Paschal |
|
4 | 1.47% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
372 | 80.87% |
Berry |
|
77 | 16.74% |
Paschal |
|
11 | 2.39% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
Wright |
|
426 | 67.09% |
Berry |
|
192 | 30.24% |
Paschal |
|
17 | 2.68% |
Source: Virginia Department of Elections and the Associated Press.