Javascript is required to run this page
Scott Taylor

Scott Taylor

Scott Taylor served in the House of Representatives from 2017 to 2019 (CD2).
Also served in the House of Delegates from 2014 to 2017 (HD85).
Republican

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Scott Taylor vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/04/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (68-Y 27-N 2-A)
    02/04/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (68-Y 27-N 2-A)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/02/2016 - House: Senate amendments agreed to by House (75-Y 19-N)
    03/02/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (75-Y 19-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

  • 02/16/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (79-Y 19-N)
    02/16/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (79-Y 19-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/07/2016 - House: Senate substitute agreed to by House 16105759D-S1 (89-Y 5-N)
    03/07/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (89-Y 5-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

  • 02/16/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (91-Y 8-N)
    02/16/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (91-Y 8-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/16/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (66-Y 32-N)
    02/16/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (66-Y 32-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/04/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (75-Y 22-N)
    02/04/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (75-Y 22-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 04/20/2016 - House: House concurred in Governor's recommendation (59-Y 40-N)
    04/20/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (59-Y 40-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

  • 04/20/2016 - House: Motion that Governor recommendation is not specific and severable is rejected (36-Y 63-N)
    04/20/2016 - House: VOTE: Not Specific and Severable (36-Y 63-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    No

  • 04/20/2016 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation (47-Y 51-N)
    04/20/2016 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (47-Y 51-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

  • 03/11/2016 - House: Conference report agreed to by House (65-Y 32-N)
    03/11/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (65-Y 32-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

  • 02/10/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (62-Y 33-N)
    02/10/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (62-Y 33-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/02/2016 - House: Senate substitute agreed to by House 16105835D-S1 (96-Y 2-N)
    03/02/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (96-Y 2-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 04/20/2016 - House: Passed House (90-Y 10-N)
    04/20/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (90-Y 10-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

  • 03/07/2016 - House: Senate substitute agreed to by House 16106000D-S1 (86-Y 8-N)
    03/07/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (86-Y 8-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

  • 02/09/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (93-Y 7-N)
    02/09/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (93-Y 7-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/07/2016 - House: Senate amendment rejected by House (2-Y 94-N)
    03/07/2016 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (2-Y 94-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    No

Bill Details
  • 04/20/2016 - House: Passed House (88-Y 9-N)
    04/20/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE #2 (88-Y 9-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

  • 04/20/2016 - House: Passed House (87-Y 10-N)
    04/20/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (87-Y 10-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

  • 03/11/2016 - House: Conference report agreed to by House (89-Y 8-N)
    03/11/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (89-Y 8-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

  • 03/09/2016 - House: Senate substitute rejected by House 16106211D-S1 (1-Y 98-N)
    03/09/2016 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (1-Y 98-N)

    Scott Taylor:
    No

  • 02/09/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (93-Y 5-N 1-A)
    02/09/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (93-Y 5-N 1-A)

    Scott Taylor:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.