
Scott Taylor
Also served in the House of Delegates from 2014 to 2017 (HD85).
Republican
Voting Unity: Republican Caucus
HB770
Conditional zoning; provisions applicable to all rezoning proffers, definitions.
-
02/04/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (68-Y 27-N 2-A)
02/04/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (68-Y 27-N 2-A)Scott Taylor:
Yes
HB775
Fantasy Contests Act; created, registration required, conditions of registration, civil penalty.
-
03/02/2016 - House: Senate amendments agreed to by House (75-Y 19-N)
03/02/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (75-Y 19-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes -
02/16/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (79-Y 19-N)
02/16/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (79-Y 19-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes
HB786
Virginia Public Procurement Act; authorized enhancement or remedial measures.
-
03/07/2016 - House: Senate substitute agreed to by House 16105759D-S1 (89-Y 5-N)
03/07/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (89-Y 5-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes -
02/16/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (91-Y 8-N)
02/16/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (91-Y 8-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes
HB811
Involuntary admission procedures; notification to family member about proceedings.
-
02/16/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (66-Y 32-N)
02/16/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (66-Y 32-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes
HB812
Limited Residential Lodging Act; established, penalty.
-
02/04/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (75-Y 22-N)
02/04/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (75-Y 22-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes
HB815
Execution; if lethal injection is not available, electrocution shall be used.
-
04/20/2016 - House: House concurred in Governor's recommendation (59-Y 40-N)
04/20/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (59-Y 40-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes -
04/20/2016 - House: Motion that Governor recommendation is not specific and severable is rejected (36-Y 63-N)
04/20/2016 - House: VOTE: Not Specific and Severable (36-Y 63-N)Scott Taylor:
No -
04/20/2016 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation (47-Y 51-N)
04/20/2016 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (47-Y 51-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes -
03/11/2016 - House: Conference report agreed to by House (65-Y 32-N)
03/11/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (65-Y 32-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes -
02/10/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (62-Y 33-N)
02/10/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (62-Y 33-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes
HB825
Military medical personnel; pilot program for personnel to practice medicine.
-
03/02/2016 - House: Senate substitute agreed to by House 16105835D-S1 (96-Y 2-N)
03/02/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (96-Y 2-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes
HB834
Virginia Growth and Opportunity Board and Fund; established, report.
-
04/20/2016 - House: Passed House (90-Y 10-N)
04/20/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (90-Y 10-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes -
03/07/2016 - House: Senate substitute agreed to by House 16106000D-S1 (86-Y 8-N)
03/07/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (86-Y 8-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes -
02/09/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (93-Y 7-N)
02/09/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (93-Y 7-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes
HB842
Teachers; preparation and licensure, professional development in indicators of dyslexia.
-
03/07/2016 - House: Senate amendment rejected by House (2-Y 94-N)
03/07/2016 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (2-Y 94-N)Scott Taylor:
No
HB846
Virginia Collaborative Economic Development Act; established, sunset provision.
-
04/20/2016 - House: Passed House (88-Y 9-N)
04/20/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE #2 (88-Y 9-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes -
04/20/2016 - House: Passed House (87-Y 10-N)
04/20/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (87-Y 10-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes -
03/11/2016 - House: Conference report agreed to by House (89-Y 8-N)
03/11/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (89-Y 8-N)Scott Taylor:
Yes -
03/09/2016 - House: Senate substitute rejected by House 16106211D-S1 (1-Y 98-N)
03/09/2016 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (1-Y 98-N)Scott Taylor:
No -
02/09/2016 - House: Read third time and passed House (93-Y 5-N 1-A)
02/09/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (93-Y 5-N 1-A)Scott Taylor:
Yes
VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.