Javascript is required to run this page
Matthew James

Matthew James

Matthew James served in the House of Delegates from 2010 to 2019 (HD80).
Democrat

Voting Unity: Democratic Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Matthew James vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Democrats take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/19/2019 - House: Passed House with amendments (61-Y 38-N)
    02/19/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (61-Y 38-N)

    Matthew James:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/13/2019 - House: Passed House (84-Y 13-N)
    02/13/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (84-Y 13-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 04/03/2019 - House: House concurred in Governor's recommendation (60-Y 39-N)
    04/03/2019 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (60-Y 39-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/11/2019 - House: Passed House with amendment (66-Y 30-N 1-A)
    02/11/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE #2 (66-Y 30-N 1-A)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

  • 02/11/2019 - House: Passed House (65-Y 33-N 1-A)
    02/11/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (65-Y 33-N 1-A)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/19/2019 - House: Passed House with substitute (93-Y 4-N)
    02/19/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (93-Y 4-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2019 - House: Passed House with substitute (82-Y 16-N 1-A)
    02/20/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (82-Y 16-N 1-A)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/19/2019 - House: Passed House (96-Y 2-N)
    02/19/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (96-Y 2-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2019 - House: Passed House (87-Y 12-N)
    02/20/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (87-Y 12-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2019 - House: Passed House (71-Y 27-N)
    02/22/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (71-Y 27-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.