Javascript is required to run this page
Matthew James

Matthew James

Matthew James served in the House of Delegates from 2010 to 2019 (HD80).
Democrat

Voting Unity: Democratic Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Matthew James vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Democrats take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 01/31/2019 - House: Read third time and passed House (53-Y 45-N)
    01/31/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (53-Y 45-N)

    Matthew James:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/05/2019 - House: Read third time and passed House (84-Y 14-N)
    02/05/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (84-Y 14-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/05/2019 - House: Read third time and passed House (97-Y 2-N)
    02/05/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (97-Y 2-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2019 - House: Senate amendments rejected by House (2-Y 95-N)
    02/21/2019 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (2-Y 95-N)

    Matthew James:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/31/2019 - House: Read third time and passed House (98-Y 1-N)
    01/31/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (98-Y 1-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/04/2019 - House: Read third time and passed House (95-Y 2-N)
    02/04/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (95-Y 2-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/25/2019 - House: Read third time and passed House (91-Y 5-N)
    01/25/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (91-Y 5-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/05/2019 - House: Read third time and passed House (98-Y 1-N)
    02/05/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (98-Y 1-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/19/2019 - House: Senate substitute with amendment agreed to by House 19107053D-S1 (96-Y 1-N)
    02/19/2019 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (96-Y 1-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/05/2019 - House: Read third time and passed House (82-Y 15-N 1-A)
    02/05/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (82-Y 15-N 1-A)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.