Javascript is required to run this page

Donald McEachin

Donald McEachin served in the House of Representatives from 2017 to 2022 (CD4).
Also served in the State Senate from 2008 to 2017 (SD9), and in the House of Delegates from 2006 to 2008 (HD74) and from 1996 to 2002 (HD74).
Democrat

Voting Unity: Democratic Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Donald McEachin vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Democrats take the same position?

With Caucus

90%


Other

10%



  • 02/16/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (25-Y 13-N)
    02/16/2016 - Senate: Reconsideration of passage agreed to by Senate (35-Y 3-N 1-A)

    Donald McEachin:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/07/2016 - Senate: Impact statement from DPB (SB746H1)
    03/08/2016 - Senate: House substitute agreed to by Senate (37-Y 3-N)

    Donald McEachin:
    Yes

  • 02/11/2016 - Senate: Previous question ordered (23-Y 15-N 1-A)
    02/11/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (24-Y 16-N)

    Donald McEachin:
    No

  • 02/10/2016 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB746S1
    02/11/2016 - Senate: Previous question ordered (23-Y 15-N 1-A)

    Donald McEachin:
    No

Bill Details
  • 03/11/2016 - Conference: Amended by conference committee
    03/11/2016 - Senate: Conference report agreed to by Senate (37-Y 2-N)

    Donald McEachin:
    Yes

  • 03/04/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (96-Y 2-N 1-A)
    03/08/2016 - Senate: House substitute rejected by Senate (1-Y 39-N)

    Donald McEachin:
    No

  • 02/16/2016 - Senate: Pending question ordered (27-Y 11-N)
    02/16/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (33-Y 6-N)

    Donald McEachin:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/10/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (50-Y 45-N)
    03/10/2016 - Senate: House amendment agreed to by Senate (22-Y 17-N)

    Donald McEachin:
    No

  • 02/08/2016 - Senate: Reconsideration of passage agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
    02/08/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (24-Y 16-N)

    Donald McEachin:
    No

  • 02/08/2016 - Senate: Passed by temporarily
    02/08/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (22-Y 18-N)

    Donald McEachin:
    No

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.