
Donald McEachin
Also served in the State Senate from 2008 to 2017 (SD9), and in the House of Delegates from 2006 to 2008 (HD74) and from 1996 to 2002 (HD74).
Democrat
Voting Unity: Democratic Caucus
SB740
Electronic textbooks; use by students.
-
02/16/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (25-Y 13-N)
02/16/2016 - Senate: Reconsideration of passage agreed to by Senate (35-Y 3-N 1-A)Donald McEachin:
Yes
SB746
Recovery of attorney fees from agency; actions brought in violation of law or for improper purpose.
-
03/07/2016 - Senate: Impact statement from DPB (SB746H1)
03/08/2016 - Senate: House substitute agreed to by Senate (37-Y 3-N)Donald McEachin:
Yes -
02/11/2016 - Senate: Previous question ordered (23-Y 15-N 1-A)
02/11/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (24-Y 16-N)Donald McEachin:
No -
02/10/2016 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB746S1
02/11/2016 - Senate: Previous question ordered (23-Y 15-N 1-A)Donald McEachin:
No
SB748
Economic Development Infrastructure Act of 2016; acquisition of utility right of way.
-
03/11/2016 - Conference: Amended by conference committee
03/11/2016 - Senate: Conference report agreed to by Senate (37-Y 2-N)Donald McEachin:
Yes -
03/04/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (96-Y 2-N 1-A)
03/08/2016 - Senate: House substitute rejected by Senate (1-Y 39-N)Donald McEachin:
No -
02/16/2016 - Senate: Pending question ordered (27-Y 11-N)
02/16/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (33-Y 6-N)Donald McEachin:
Yes
SB767
Form of ballot; party identification of candidates.
-
03/10/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (50-Y 45-N)
03/10/2016 - Senate: House amendment agreed to by Senate (22-Y 17-N)Donald McEachin:
No -
02/08/2016 - Senate: Reconsideration of passage agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
02/08/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (24-Y 16-N)Donald McEachin:
No -
02/08/2016 - Senate: Passed by temporarily
02/08/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (22-Y 18-N)Donald McEachin:
No
VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.