Javascript is required to run this page
Mark Obenshain

Mark Obenshain

Mark Obenshain has served in the State Senate since 2004.
Republican
Currently represents State Senate District 2

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Mark Obenshain vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 01/29/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute
    01/30/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (35-Y 5-N)

    Mark Obenshain:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/31/2025 - Senate: Passed by temporarily
    01/31/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (37-Y 2-N 1-A)

    Mark Obenshain:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2025 - House: Passed House with amendments (58-Y 39-N)
    02/20/2025 - Senate: House Amendments agreed to by Senate (35-Y 4-N)

    Mark Obenshain:
    No

  • 01/27/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate
    01/28/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (35-Y 4-N)

    Mark Obenshain:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2025 - Senate: Conference substitute printed 25107984D-S1
    02/22/2025 - Senate: Conference report agreed to by Senate (37-Y 3-N)

    Mark Obenshain:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/04/2025 - Senate: Constitutional reading dispensed (on 3rd reading) (40-Y 0-N)
    02/04/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (34-Y 6-N)

    Mark Obenshain:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/04/2025 - Senate: Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (SB1350)
    02/04/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (35-Y 5-N)

    Mark Obenshain:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/29/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute
    01/30/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (33-Y 6-N 1-A)

    Mark Obenshain:
    No

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.