Emily Jordan

Emily Jordan has served in the State Senate since 2024.
Also served in the House of Delegates from 2018 to 2024 (HD64).
Republican

Currently represents State Senate District 17

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:

Issue Filter:

How often does Emily Jordan vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus

91%

Other

SB1442

Public Safety & Homeland Security & HHR, Secretaries of; combat sale of illicit cannabis products.

01/27/2025 - Senate: Rules suspended
01/27/2025 - Senate: Constitutional reading dispensed (on 1st reading) (37-Y 1-N)

Emily Jordan:
Yes

Bill Details

SB1449

Data centers; site assessment for high energy use facility.

03/24/2025 - Governor's recommendation received by Senate
04/02/2025 - Senate: Senate rejected Governor's recommendation (16-Y 24-N)

Emily Jordan:
Yes
02/21/2025 - Amended by conference committee
02/21/2025 - Senate: Conference report agreed to by Senate (26-Y 13-N 1-A)

Emily Jordan:
No
01/29/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute
01/30/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (33-Y 6-N 1-A)

Emily Jordan:
Yes

Bill Details

SB1462

High school graduation requirements; history and social studies credits, etc.

03/24/2025 - Governor's Recommendation
04/02/2025 - Senate: Senate rejected Governor's recommendation (18-Y 22-N)

Emily Jordan:
Yes

Bill Details

SB1466

Criminal records; expungement and sealing of records, repeals Sealing Fee Fund.

02/03/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - floor substitute
02/04/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (25-Y 15-N)

Emily Jordan:
No

Bill Details

SB1476

Vacant and blighted or derelict property; locality allowed to sell.

02/12/2025 - House: Passed House with amendments (97-Y 0-N)
02/14/2025 - Senate: House Amendment agreed to by Senate (30-Y 5-N)

Emily Jordan:
Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.