Javascript is required to run this page
Dan Helmer

Dan Helmer

Dan Helmer has served in the House of Delegates since 2020.
Democrat
Currently represents House of Delegates District 10

Voting Unity: Democratic Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Dan Helmer vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Democrats take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/18/2025 - House: Read third time
    02/18/2025 - House: Passed House (49-Y 47-N)

    Dan Helmer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2025 - Senate: Conference substitute printed 25107992D-S1
    02/22/2025 - House: Conference report agreed to by House (54-Y 40-N)

    Dan Helmer:
    Yes

  • 02/18/2025 - House: Engrossed by House - committee substitute
    02/18/2025 - House: Passed House with substitute (52-Y 44-N)

    Dan Helmer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2025 - Senate: Conference report agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
    02/22/2025 - House: Conference report agreed to by House (96-Y 1-N)

    Dan Helmer:
    Yes

  • 02/20/2025 - House: Engrossed by House - committee substitute
    02/20/2025 - House: Passed House with substitute (97-Y 1-N)

    Dan Helmer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/19/2025 - House: Engrossed by House - floor substitute
    02/19/2025 - House: Passed House with substitute (88-Y 9-N)

    Dan Helmer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 04/02/2025 - Senate: Senate concurred in Governor's recommendation (38-Y 2-N)
    04/02/2025 - House: House concurred in Governor's recommendation (80-Y 15-N)

    Dan Helmer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/12/2025 - House: Constitutional reading dispensed (on 3rd reading) (95-Y 0-N)
    02/12/2025 - House: Passed House (53-Y 42-N)

    Dan Helmer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/17/2025 - House: Read third time
    02/17/2025 - House: Passed House (87-Y 7-N)

    Dan Helmer:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.