Javascript is required to run this page
Amanda Batten

Amanda Batten

Amanda Batten has served in the House of Delegates since 2020.
Republican
Currently represents House of Delegates District 71

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Amanda Batten vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 04/02/2025 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation (11-Y 85-N)
    04/02/2025 - House: Motion to pass in enrolled form rejected (51-Y 44-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    No

  • 03/24/2025 - Governor's recommendation received by House
    04/02/2025 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation (11-Y 85-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    No

  • 02/21/2025 - Senate: Conference report agreed to by Senate (22-Y 13-N 1-A)
    02/22/2025 - House: Conference report agreed to by House (55-Y 44-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    No

  • 01/22/2025 - House: Printed as engrossed 25102219D-E
    01/23/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (57-Y 40-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/24/2025 - House: Printed as engrossed 25100376D-E
    01/27/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (92-Y 3-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/03/2025 - House: Read second time and engrossed
    02/04/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (52-Y 47-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/18/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendment (23-Y 16-N)
    02/19/2025 - House: Senate Amendment agreed to by House (85-Y 9-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    Yes

  • 01/30/2025 - House: Engrossed by House - committee substitute
    01/31/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (84-Y 11-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/04/2025 - House: Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB1610)
    02/04/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (55-Y 44-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/17/2025 - House: Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB1614)
    02/18/2025 - House: Senate substitute agreed to by House (89-Y 7-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    Yes

  • 01/27/2025 - House: Printed as engrossed 25103452D-E
    01/28/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (89-Y 9-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/04/2025 - House: Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB1616)
    02/04/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (57-Y 41-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/30/2025 - House: Printed as engrossed 25105153D-EH1
    01/31/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (92-Y 2-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/29/2025 - House: Engrossed by House
    01/30/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (51-Y 45-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/29/2025 - House: Read second time and engrossed
    01/30/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (51-Y 45-N)

    Amanda Batten:
    No

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.