Javascript is required to run this page
Jeremy McPike

Jeremy McPike

Jeremy McPike has served in the State Senate since 2016.
Democrat
Currently represents State Senate District 29

Voting Unity: Democratic Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Jeremy McPike vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Democrats take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 04/02/2025 - House: House concurred in Governor's recommendation (96-Y 0-N)
    04/02/2025 - Senate: Senate rejected Governor's recommendation (19-Y 21-N)

    Jeremy McPike:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/18/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute
    02/18/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with substitute (24-Y 16-N)

    Jeremy McPike:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate as amended
    02/20/2025 - Senate: Defeated by Senate (17-Y 22-N)

    Jeremy McPike:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/19/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate as amended
    02/19/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendments (24-Y 16-N)

    Jeremy McPike:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2025 - Senate: Read third time
    02/20/2025 - Senate: Defeated by Senate (18-Y 20-N)

    Jeremy McPike:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/19/2025 - Senate: Read third time
    02/19/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (37-Y 3-N)

    Jeremy McPike:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/18/2025 - Senate: Read third time
    02/18/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (21-Y 19-N)

    Jeremy McPike:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/17/2025 - House: Passed House with substitute (96-Y 0-N)
    02/18/2025 - Senate: House substitute rejected by Senate (1-Y 39-N)

    Jeremy McPike:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/21/2025 - Senate: Motion to rerefer to committee rejected (19-Y 21-N)
    01/21/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (23-Y 17-N)

    Jeremy McPike:
    No

Bill Details
  • 03/24/2025 - Governor's recommendation received by Senate
    04/02/2025 - Senate: Senate concurred in Governor's recommendation (23-Y 17-N)

    Jeremy McPike:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.