Javascript is required to run this page
Jim LeMunyon

Jim LeMunyon

Jim LeMunyon served in the House of Delegates from 2010 to 2018 (HD67).
Republican

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Jim LeMunyon vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/20/2017 - House: Senate amendment agreed to by House (60-Y 34-N 1-A)
    02/20/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (60-Y 34-N 1-A)

    Jim LeMunyon:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/25/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (87-Y 11-N)
    01/25/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (87-Y 11-N)

    Jim LeMunyon:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/25/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (83-Y 14-N)
    01/25/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (83-Y 14-N)

    Jim LeMunyon:
    No

Bill Details
  • 04/05/2017 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation (36-Y 62-N)
    04/05/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED EMERGENCY (36-Y 62-N)

    Jim LeMunyon:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/03/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (59-Y 36-N)
    02/03/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (59-Y 36-N)

    Jim LeMunyon:
    No

Bill Details
  • 04/05/2017 - House: House concurred in Governor's recommendation (97-Y 1-N)
    04/05/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (97-Y 1-N)

    Jim LeMunyon:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/27/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (97-Y 1-N)
    01/27/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (97-Y 1-N)

    Jim LeMunyon:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/25/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (65-Y 34-N)
    01/25/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (65-Y 34-N)

    Jim LeMunyon:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/07/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (53-Y 44-N)
    02/07/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (53-Y 44-N)

    Jim LeMunyon:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/25/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (82-Y 16-N)
    01/25/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (82-Y 16-N)

    Jim LeMunyon:
    No

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.