Javascript is required to run this page
Rich Anderson

Rich Anderson

Rich Anderson served in the House of Delegates from 2010 to 2018 (HD51).
Republican

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Rich Anderson vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House (94-Y 2-N)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (94-Y 2-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2017 - House: Defeated by House (20-Y 80-N)
    02/22/2017 - House: VOTE:DEFEATED (20-Y 80-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House (84-Y 13-N)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (84-Y 13-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House with amendments (91-Y 3-N)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (91-Y 3-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House with substitute (84-Y 12-N)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (84-Y 12-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2017 - House: Passed House (98-Y 2-N)
    02/22/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (98-Y 2-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/17/2017 - House: Passed House (98-Y 1-N)
    02/17/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (98-Y 1-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/24/2017 - House: House concurred in Governor's recommendation (90-Y 1-N)
    02/24/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (90-Y 1-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2017 - House: Passed House (93-Y 6-N)
    02/22/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (93-Y 6-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/17/2017 - House: Passed House with substitute (85-Y 14-N)
    02/17/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (85-Y 14-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.