Javascript is required to run this page
Rich Anderson

Rich Anderson

Rich Anderson served in the House of Delegates from 2010 to 2018 (HD51).
Republican

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Rich Anderson vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/15/2017 - House: Passed House (97-Y 1-N 1-A)
    02/15/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (97-Y 1-N 1-A)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House with amendment (89-Y 7-N)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (89-Y 7-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2017 - House: Passed House (71-Y 25-N)
    02/20/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (71-Y 25-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/25/2017 - House: Conference report agreed to by House (89-Y 7-N)
    02/25/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (89-Y 7-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2017 - House: Passed House (59-Y 37-N)
    02/20/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (59-Y 37-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2017 - House: Passed House (65-Y 34-N)
    02/22/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (65-Y 34-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2017 - House: Passed House (98-Y 2-N)
    02/22/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (98-Y 2-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 04/05/2017 - House: House concurred in Governor's recommendation (86-Y 10-N 1-A)
    04/05/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (86-Y 10-N 1-A)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

  • 02/17/2017 - House: Passed House (75-Y 20-N 2-A)
    02/17/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (75-Y 20-N 2-A)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2017 - House: Passed House (54-Y 43-N)
    02/20/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (54-Y 43-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/15/2017 - House: Passed House with amendment (67-Y 31-N 1-A)
    02/15/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (67-Y 31-N 1-A)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.