Javascript is required to run this page
Rich Anderson

Rich Anderson

Rich Anderson served in the House of Delegates from 2010 to 2018 (HD51).
Republican

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Rich Anderson vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/15/2017 - House: Passed House with substitute (68-Y 30-N)
    02/15/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (68-Y 30-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House with amendment (62-Y 35-N)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (62-Y 35-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/23/2017 - House: Passed House (65-Y 35-N)
    02/23/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (65-Y 35-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/24/2017 - House: Conference report agreed to by House (57-Y 38-N)
    02/24/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (57-Y 38-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House with amendment (55-Y 41-N)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (55-Y 41-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House (84-Y 12-N)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (84-Y 12-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/15/2017 - House: Passed House (93-Y 6-N)
    02/15/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (93-Y 6-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2017 - House: Passed House with amendment (58-Y 40-N)
    02/22/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (58-Y 40-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/23/2017 - House: Passed House with amendment (99-Y 1-N)
    02/23/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (99-Y 1-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2017 - House: Passed House with amendments (67-Y 32-N)
    02/22/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (67-Y 32-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/15/2017 - House: Passed House (92-Y 5-N 1-A)
    02/15/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (92-Y 5-N 1-A)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.