Javascript is required to run this page
Rich Anderson

Rich Anderson

Rich Anderson served in the House of Delegates from 2010 to 2018 (HD51).
Republican

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Rich Anderson vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/15/2017 - House: VOTE: AGREE TO MOTION (97-Y 0-N)
    02/15/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (81-Y 13-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House with amendment (91-Y 2-N 2-A)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (91-Y 2-N 2-A)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House (85-Y 9-N 2-A)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (85-Y 9-N 2-A)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House (87-Y 7-N 2-A)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (87-Y 7-N 2-A)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 04/05/2017 - House: House concurred in Governor's recommendation (96-Y 2-N)
    04/05/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (96-Y 2-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

  • 02/17/2017 - House: Passed House with substitute (96-Y 1-N 2-A)
    02/17/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (96-Y 1-N 2-A)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2017 - House: Passed House with substitute (77-Y 20-N)
    02/22/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (77-Y 20-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/16/2017 - House: Passed House with substitute (95-Y 2-N)
    02/16/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (95-Y 2-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/17/2017 - House: Passed House (88-Y 10-N 1-A)
    02/17/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (88-Y 10-N 1-A)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House (85-Y 9-N)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (85-Y 9-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/14/2017 - House: Passed House (95-Y 3-N)
    02/14/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (95-Y 3-N)

    Rich Anderson:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.