House of Delegates District 65

Piedmont
Competitive
District Profile
Elections
Precinct Results
Redistricting

Partisan Lean of HD65 voters

Based on 2021 Governor's Race
Results are based on estimated absentee votes.
The state Department of Elections does not publish results by state legislative district. VPAP has developed what it believes to be reasonable estimates for calcuating the results by legislative district. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Republican Candidate
Glenn Youngkin 		16,503 50.97%
Democrat Candidate
Terry McAuliffe 		15,557 48.05%
Liberation Party Candidate
Princess Blanding 		282 0.87%
Election-Day Ballots Mapped by Precinct
The results on this map are incomplete and do not include an estimated 10,898 early ballots.
>+20D
0 to +20D
0 to +20R
>+20R
Fredericksburg City
Election Day Votes: 60.0%
Early In-Person Votes: 28.3%
Mail Ballots: 11.7%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 5,389 59.77%
Youngkin 3,497 38.79%
Blanding 113 1.25%
Actual results for Fredericksburg City.
HD65 includes all of Fredericksburg City, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.


These are actual results for HD65.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 1,535 60.13%
Youngkin 993 38.90%
Blanding 22 0.86%

These are actual results for HD65.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 848 80.76%
Youngkin 190 18.10%
Blanding 12 1.14%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 828 51.98%
Youngkin 743 46.64%
Blanding 18 1.13%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 750 55.80%
Youngkin 560 41.67%
Blanding 28 2.08%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 589 49.79%
Youngkin 582 49.20%
Blanding 11 0.93%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 507 71.31%
Youngkin 192 27.00%
Blanding 12 1.69%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 332 57.04%
Youngkin 237 40.72%
Blanding 10 1.72%
Spotsylvania County
Election Day Votes: 63.9%
Early In-Person Votes: 28.0%
Mail Ballots: 8.1%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 2,200 54.89%
McAuliffe 1,772 44.21%
Blanding 32 0.80%
Estimated results for Spotsylvania County.
Spotsylvania County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Spotsylvania County that falls within HD65.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 585 52.19%
McAuliffe 529 47.19%
Blanding 6 0.54%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 250 76.92%
Youngkin 70 21.54%
Blanding 5 1.54%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 826 62.43%
McAuliffe 492 37.19%
Blanding 4 0.30%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 719 58.03%
McAuliffe 501 40.44%
Blanding 17 1.37%
Stafford County
Election Day Votes: 69.8%
Early In-Person Votes: 22.2%
Mail Ballots: 8.0%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 10,806 55.84%
McAuliffe 8,396 43.39%
Blanding 137 0.71%
Estimated results for Stafford County.
Stafford County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Stafford County that falls within HD65.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 2,153 50.10%
McAuliffe 2,126 49.48%
Blanding 16 0.37%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 1,050 67.65%
Youngkin 476 30.67%
Blanding 24 1.55%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 818 56.07%
McAuliffe 628 43.04%
Blanding 12 0.82%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,338 66.34%
McAuliffe 661 32.77%
Blanding 16 0.79%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 862 57.66%
McAuliffe 628 42.01%
Blanding 5 0.33%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 863 57.96%
McAuliffe 607 40.77%
Blanding 17 1.14%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 583 52.95%
Youngkin 512 46.50%
Blanding 6 0.54%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 914 65.76%
McAuliffe 466 33.53%
Blanding 8 0.58%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 994 61.43%
McAuliffe 614 37.95%
Blanding 9 0.56%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,533 73.81%
McAuliffe 536 25.81%
Blanding 8 0.39%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 497 57.99%
Youngkin 343 40.02%
Blanding 16 1.87%