Official results from the
Virginia Department of Elections
228 of 228 precincts reporting (100.00%)
| Abigail Spanberger | 33,210 | 72.68% |
| Dan Ward | 12,483 | 27.32% |
Amelia County
| Spanberger | 49 (62.03%) |
| Ward | 30 (37.97%) |
| Spanberger | 121 (76.58%) |
| Ward | 37 (23.42%) |
| Spanberger | 48 (73.85%) |
| Ward | 17 (26.15%) |
| Spanberger | 59 (79.73%) |
| Ward | 15 (20.27%) |
| Spanberger | 128 (82.58%) |
| Ward | 27 (17.42%) |
| Spanberger | 22 (75.86%) |
| Ward | 7 (24.14%) |
| Spanberger | 1 (100.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
Chesterfield County
| Spanberger | 72 (60.00%) |
| Ward | 48 (40.00%) |
| Spanberger | 192 (62.75%) |
| Ward | 114 (37.25%) |
| Spanberger | 134 (73.22%) |
| Ward | 49 (26.78%) |
| Spanberger | 237 (60.61%) |
| Ward | 154 (39.39%) |
| Spanberger | 121 (62.37%) |
| Ward | 73 (37.63%) |
| Spanberger | 71 (68.27%) |
| Ward | 33 (31.73%) |
| Spanberger | 170 (53.46%) |
| Ward | 148 (46.54%) |
| Spanberger | 268 (66.50%) |
| Ward | 135 (33.50%) |
| Spanberger | 82 (67.21%) |
| Ward | 40 (32.79%) |
| Spanberger | 333 (52.11%) |
| Ward | 306 (47.89%) |
| Spanberger | 22 (61.11%) |
| Ward | 14 (38.89%) |
| Spanberger | 63 (53.39%) |
| Ward | 55 (46.61%) |
| Spanberger | 66 (74.16%) |
| Ward | 23 (25.84%) |
| Spanberger | 121 (63.68%) |
| Ward | 69 (36.32%) |
| Spanberger | 221 (78.65%) |
| Ward | 60 (21.35%) |
| Spanberger | 60 (75.00%) |
| Ward | 20 (25.00%) |
| Spanberger | 272 (79.77%) |
| Ward | 69 (20.23%) |
| Spanberger | 300 (84.99%) |
| Ward | 53 (15.01%) |
| Spanberger | 325 (84.86%) |
| Ward | 58 (15.14%) |
| Spanberger | 149 (79.26%) |
| Ward | 39 (20.74%) |
| Spanberger | 143 (78.14%) |
| Ward | 40 (21.86%) |
| Spanberger | 282 (76.84%) |
| Ward | 85 (23.16%) |
| Spanberger | 49 (53.85%) |
| Ward | 42 (46.15%) |
| Spanberger | 154 (77.78%) |
| Ward | 44 (22.22%) |
| Spanberger | 288 (72.36%) |
| Ward | 110 (27.64%) |
| Spanberger | 324 (85.49%) |
| Ward | 55 (14.51%) |
| Spanberger | 216 (74.48%) |
| Ward | 74 (25.52%) |
| Spanberger | 261 (79.09%) |
| Ward | 69 (20.91%) |
| Spanberger | 239 (84.45%) |
| Ward | 44 (15.55%) |
| Spanberger | 134 (77.01%) |
| Ward | 40 (22.99%) |
| Spanberger | 330 (69.33%) |
| Ward | 146 (30.67%) |
| Spanberger | 131 (77.51%) |
| Ward | 38 (22.49%) |
| Spanberger | 96 (66.21%) |
| Ward | 49 (33.79%) |
| Spanberger | 298 (78.42%) |
| Ward | 82 (21.58%) |
| Spanberger | 250 (84.46%) |
| Ward | 46 (15.54%) |
| Spanberger | 186 (66.19%) |
| Ward | 95 (33.81%) |
| Spanberger | 230 (83.33%) |
| Ward | 46 (16.67%) |
| Spanberger | 110 (81.48%) |
| Ward | 25 (18.52%) |
| Spanberger | 140 (86.96%) |
| Ward | 21 (13.04%) |
| Spanberger | 276 (82.63%) |
| Ward | 58 (17.37%) |
| Spanberger | 208 (85.60%) |
| Ward | 35 (14.40%) |
| Spanberger | 209 (82.94%) |
| Ward | 43 (17.06%) |
| Spanberger | 453 (84.36%) |
| Ward | 84 (15.64%) |
| Spanberger | 476 (90.32%) |
| Ward | 51 (9.68%) |
| Spanberger | 316 (83.38%) |
| Ward | 63 (16.62%) |
| Spanberger | 364 (86.67%) |
| Ward | 56 (13.33%) |
| Spanberger | 189 (71.86%) |
| Ward | 74 (28.14%) |
| Spanberger | 197 (81.74%) |
| Ward | 44 (18.26%) |
| Spanberger | 272 (85.00%) |
| Ward | 48 (15.00%) |
| Spanberger | 245 (91.42%) |
| Ward | 23 (8.58%) |
| Spanberger | 89 (77.39%) |
| Ward | 26 (22.61%) |
| Spanberger | 308 (87.01%) |
| Ward | 46 (12.99%) |
| Spanberger | 160 (62.26%) |
| Ward | 97 (37.74%) |
| Spanberger | 135 (54.66%) |
| Ward | 112 (45.34%) |
| Spanberger | 58 (87.88%) |
| Ward | 8 (12.12%) |
| Spanberger | 258 (90.53%) |
| Ward | 27 (9.47%) |
| Spanberger | 395 (78.22%) |
| Ward | 110 (21.78%) |
| Spanberger | 2 (66.67%) |
| Ward | 1 (33.33%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
Culpeper County
| Ward | 157 (55.67%) |
| Spanberger | 125 (44.33%) |
| Ward | 122 (54.46%) |
| Spanberger | 102 (45.54%) |
| Spanberger | 46 (68.66%) |
| Ward | 21 (31.34%) |
| Spanberger | 30 (61.22%) |
| Ward | 19 (38.78%) |
| Spanberger | 31 (52.54%) |
| Ward | 28 (47.46%) |
| Spanberger | 43 (52.44%) |
| Ward | 39 (47.56%) |
| Ward | 95 (55.23%) |
| Spanberger | 77 (44.77%) |
| Ward | 55 (50.93%) |
| Spanberger | 53 (49.07%) |
| Ward | 75 (59.06%) |
| Spanberger | 52 (40.94%) |
| Ward | 18 (69.23%) |
| Spanberger | 8 (30.77%) |
| Ward | 92 (60.13%) |
| Spanberger | 61 (39.87%) |
| Spanberger | 28 (50.91%) |
| Ward | 27 (49.09%) |
| Spanberger | 48 (51.06%) |
| Ward | 46 (48.94%) |
| Ward | 31 (52.54%) |
| Spanberger | 28 (47.46%) |
| Ward | 11 (57.89%) |
| Spanberger | 8 (42.11%) |
| Spanberger | 46 (54.76%) |
| Ward | 38 (45.24%) |
| Spanberger | 1 (100.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
Goochland County
| Spanberger | 75 (68.81%) |
| Ward | 34 (31.19%) |
| Spanberger | 126 (67.38%) |
| Ward | 61 (32.62%) |
| Ward | 48 (51.61%) |
| Spanberger | 45 (48.39%) |
| Spanberger | 191 (67.25%) |
| Ward | 93 (32.75%) |
| Spanberger | 119 (73.01%) |
| Ward | 44 (26.99%) |
| Spanberger | 51 (69.86%) |
| Ward | 22 (30.14%) |
| Spanberger | 138 (71.88%) |
| Ward | 54 (28.13%) |
| Spanberger | 175 (80.65%) |
| Ward | 42 (19.35%) |
| Spanberger | 205 (82.33%) |
| Ward | 44 (17.67%) |
| Spanberger | 140 (89.17%) |
| Ward | 17 (10.83%) |
| Spanberger | 111 (84.09%) |
| Ward | 21 (15.91%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
Henrico County
| Spanberger | 303 (80.37%) |
| Ward | 74 (19.63%) |
| Spanberger | 228 (66.09%) |
| Ward | 117 (33.91%) |
| Spanberger | 282 (78.77%) |
| Ward | 76 (21.23%) |
| Spanberger | 278 (81.76%) |
| Ward | 62 (18.24%) |
| Spanberger | 160 (68.67%) |
| Ward | 73 (31.33%) |
| Spanberger | 336 (78.69%) |
| Ward | 91 (21.31%) |
| Spanberger | 59 (78.67%) |
| Ward | 16 (21.33%) |
| Spanberger | 212 (67.30%) |
| Ward | 103 (32.70%) |
| Spanberger | 334 (78.77%) |
| Ward | 90 (21.23%) |
| Spanberger | 144 (73.47%) |
| Ward | 52 (26.53%) |
| Spanberger | 79 (61.72%) |
| Ward | 49 (38.28%) |
| Spanberger | 105 (83.33%) |
| Ward | 21 (16.67%) |
| Spanberger | 289 (77.90%) |
| Ward | 82 (22.10%) |
| Spanberger | 264 (87.71%) |
| Ward | 37 (12.29%) |
| Ward | 228 (61.13%) |
| Spanberger | 145 (38.87%) |
| Spanberger | 204 (69.62%) |
| Ward | 89 (30.38%) |
| Spanberger | 44 (75.86%) |
| Ward | 14 (24.14%) |
| Spanberger | 131 (83.44%) |
| Ward | 26 (16.56%) |
| Spanberger | 276 (50.92%) |
| Ward | 266 (49.08%) |
| Spanberger | 176 (56.41%) |
| Ward | 136 (43.59%) |
| Spanberger | 93 (65.03%) |
| Ward | 50 (34.97%) |
| Spanberger | 143 (51.07%) |
| Ward | 137 (48.93%) |
| Spanberger | 109 (73.15%) |
| Ward | 40 (26.85%) |
| Spanberger | 112 (78.32%) |
| Ward | 31 (21.68%) |
| Spanberger | 76 (82.61%) |
| Ward | 16 (17.39%) |
| Spanberger | 11 (91.67%) |
| Ward | 1 (8.33%) |
| Spanberger | 33 (54.10%) |
| Ward | 28 (45.90%) |
| Spanberger | 42 (85.71%) |
| Ward | 7 (14.29%) |
| Spanberger | 211 (50.97%) |
| Ward | 203 (49.03%) |
| Spanberger | 209 (56.64%) |
| Ward | 160 (43.36%) |
| Spanberger | 222 (90.61%) |
| Ward | 23 (9.39%) |
| Spanberger | 254 (85.23%) |
| Ward | 44 (14.77%) |
| Spanberger | 219 (83.59%) |
| Ward | 43 (16.41%) |
| Spanberger | 125 (77.16%) |
| Ward | 37 (22.84%) |
| Spanberger | 381 (91.59%) |
| Ward | 35 (8.41%) |
| Spanberger | 237 (85.87%) |
| Ward | 39 (14.13%) |
| Spanberger | 124 (81.58%) |
| Ward | 28 (18.42%) |
| Spanberger | 336 (91.30%) |
| Ward | 32 (8.70%) |
| Spanberger | 287 (90.25%) |
| Ward | 31 (9.75%) |
| Spanberger | 344 (93.73%) |
| Ward | 23 (6.27%) |
| Spanberger | 300 (84.99%) |
| Ward | 53 (15.01%) |
| Spanberger | 137 (74.46%) |
| Ward | 47 (25.54%) |
| Spanberger | 413 (86.22%) |
| Ward | 66 (13.78%) |
| Spanberger | 258 (82.69%) |
| Ward | 54 (17.31%) |
| Spanberger | 191 (73.18%) |
| Ward | 70 (26.82%) |
| Spanberger | 299 (79.73%) |
| Ward | 76 (20.27%) |
| Spanberger | 221 (87.35%) |
| Ward | 32 (12.65%) |
| Spanberger | 227 (88.33%) |
| Ward | 30 (11.67%) |
| Spanberger | 166 (86.91%) |
| Ward | 25 (13.09%) |
| Spanberger | 372 (87.32%) |
| Ward | 54 (12.68%) |
| Spanberger | 317 (87.33%) |
| Ward | 46 (12.67%) |
| Spanberger | 173 (79.00%) |
| Ward | 46 (21.00%) |
| Spanberger | 216 (85.71%) |
| Ward | 36 (14.29%) |
| Spanberger | 276 (87.07%) |
| Ward | 41 (12.93%) |
| Spanberger | 195 (95.12%) |
| Ward | 10 (4.88%) |
| Spanberger | 156 (79.19%) |
| Ward | 41 (20.81%) |
| Spanberger | 267 (88.70%) |
| Ward | 34 (11.30%) |
| Spanberger | 299 (92.00%) |
| Ward | 26 (8.00%) |
| Spanberger | 345 (93.24%) |
| Ward | 25 (6.76%) |
| Spanberger | 108 (73.97%) |
| Ward | 38 (26.03%) |
| Spanberger | 162 (91.01%) |
| Ward | 16 (8.99%) |
| Spanberger | 419 (91.09%) |
| Ward | 41 (8.91%) |
| Spanberger | 168 (84.00%) |
| Ward | 32 (16.00%) |
| Spanberger | 291 (89.26%) |
| Ward | 35 (10.74%) |
| Spanberger | 620 (83.67%) |
| Ward | 121 (16.33%) |
| Ward | 2 (66.67%) |
| Spanberger | 1 (33.33%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
Louisa County
| Ward | 113 (53.30%) |
| Spanberger | 99 (46.70%) |
| Ward | 45 (51.72%) |
| Spanberger | 42 (48.28%) |
| Spanberger | 47 (57.32%) |
| Ward | 35 (42.68%) |
| Ward | 53 (51.46%) |
| Spanberger | 50 (48.54%) |
| Ward | 155 (59.16%) |
| Spanberger | 107 (40.84%) |
| Ward | 23 (52.27%) |
| Spanberger | 21 (47.73%) |
| Ward | 76 (51.70%) |
| Spanberger | 71 (48.30%) |
| Spanberger | 35 (68.63%) |
| Ward | 16 (31.37%) |
| Ward | 51 (65.38%) |
| Spanberger | 27 (34.62%) |
| Spanberger | 35 (63.64%) |
| Ward | 20 (36.36%) |
| Spanberger | 40 (68.97%) |
| Ward | 18 (31.03%) |
| Spanberger | 28 (54.90%) |
| Ward | 23 (45.10%) |
| Ward | 48 (51.06%) |
| Spanberger | 46 (48.94%) |
| Spanberger | 65 (71.43%) |
| Ward | 26 (28.57%) |
| Spanberger | 55 (69.62%) |
| Ward | 24 (30.38%) |
| Spanberger | 50 (57.47%) |
| Ward | 37 (42.53%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
Nottoway County
| Spanberger | 28 (54.90%) |
| Ward | 23 (45.10%) |
| Spanberger | 30 (58.82%) |
| Ward | 21 (41.18%) |
| Spanberger | 43 (62.32%) |
| Ward | 26 (37.68%) |
| Ward | 24 (55.81%) |
| Spanberger | 19 (44.19%) |
| Spanberger | 59 (55.66%) |
| Ward | 47 (44.34%) |
| Spanberger | 27 (71.05%) |
| Ward | 11 (28.95%) |
| Ward | 64 (55.17%) |
| Spanberger | 52 (44.83%) |
| Spanberger | 24 (51.06%) |
| Ward | 23 (48.94%) |
| Ward | 73 (54.07%) |
| Spanberger | 62 (45.93%) |
| Ward | 12 (54.55%) |
| Spanberger | 10 (45.45%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
Orange County
| Ward | 81 (50.94%) |
| Spanberger | 78 (49.06%) |
| Ward | 94 (57.32%) |
| Spanberger | 70 (42.68%) |
| Ward | 75 (65.79%) |
| Spanberger | 39 (34.21%) |
| Ward | 46 (62.16%) |
| Spanberger | 28 (37.84%) |
| Ward | 173 (75.55%) |
| Spanberger | 56 (24.45%) |
| Ward | 35 (74.47%) |
| Spanberger | 12 (25.53%) |
| Spanberger | 46 (54.76%) |
| Ward | 38 (45.24%) |
| Spanberger | 53 (57.61%) |
| Ward | 39 (42.39%) |
| Spanberger | 123 (66.49%) |
| Ward | 62 (33.51%) |
| Spanberger | 139 (61.78%) |
| Ward | 86 (38.22%) |
| Spanberger | 36 (54.55%) |
| Ward | 30 (45.45%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
Powhatan County
| Spanberger | 66 (77.65%) |
| Ward | 19 (22.35%) |
| Spanberger | 129 (84.87%) |
| Ward | 23 (15.13%) |
| Spanberger | 35 (63.64%) |
| Ward | 20 (36.36%) |
| Spanberger | 48 (77.42%) |
| Ward | 14 (22.58%) |
| Spanberger | 68 (69.39%) |
| Ward | 30 (30.61%) |
| Spanberger | 73 (73.74%) |
| Ward | 26 (26.26%) |
| Spanberger | 65 (71.43%) |
| Ward | 26 (28.57%) |
| Spanberger | 97 (67.83%) |
| Ward | 46 (32.17%) |
| Spanberger | 36 (64.29%) |
| Ward | 20 (35.71%) |
| Spanberger | 101 (65.58%) |
| Ward | 53 (34.42%) |
| Spanberger | 64 (68.82%) |
| Ward | 29 (31.18%) |
| Spanberger | 18 (56.25%) |
| Ward | 14 (43.75%) |
| Spanberger | 66 (88.00%) |
| Ward | 9 (12.00%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
Spotsylvania County
| Spanberger | 51 (62.20%) |
| Ward | 31 (37.80%) |
| Spanberger | 35 (56.45%) |
| Ward | 27 (43.55%) |
| Spanberger | 93 (58.49%) |
| Ward | 66 (41.51%) |
| Ward | 64 (52.03%) |
| Spanberger | 59 (47.97%) |
| Spanberger | 86 (60.14%) |
| Ward | 57 (39.86%) |
| Spanberger | 74 (63.79%) |
| Ward | 42 (36.21%) |
| Spanberger | 108 (60.00%) |
| Ward | 72 (40.00%) |
| Spanberger | 94 (54.97%) |
| Ward | 77 (45.03%) |
| Spanberger | 137 (55.92%) |
| Ward | 108 (44.08%) |
| Spanberger | 162 (62.31%) |
| Ward | 98 (37.69%) |
| Spanberger | 23 (62.16%) |
| Ward | 14 (37.84%) |
| Spanberger | 64 (62.14%) |
| Ward | 39 (37.86%) |
| Spanberger | 32 (60.38%) |
| Ward | 21 (39.62%) |
| Spanberger | 40 (71.43%) |
| Ward | 16 (28.57%) |
| Spanberger | 93 (60.39%) |
| Ward | 61 (39.61%) |
| Spanberger | 103 (56.59%) |
| Ward | 79 (43.41%) |
| Spanberger | 110 (58.51%) |
| Ward | 78 (41.49%) |
| Spanberger | 178 (60.75%) |
| Ward | 115 (39.25%) |
| Spanberger | 58 (51.33%) |
| Ward | 55 (48.67%) |
| Spanberger | 55 (57.29%) |
| Ward | 41 (42.71%) |
| Spanberger | 41 (67.21%) |
| Ward | 20 (32.79%) |
| Spanberger | 128 (66.67%) |
| Ward | 64 (33.33%) |
| Spanberger | 111 (68.10%) |
| Ward | 52 (31.90%) |
| Spanberger | 2 (100.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
| Spanberger | 0 (0.00%) |
| Ward | 0 (0.00%) |
This page is an archive of election results presented live on June 12, 2018.
