Javascript is required to run this page
Mark Dudenhefer

Mark Dudenhefer

Mark Dudenhefer served in the House of Delegates from 2016 to 2018 (HD2). Also served from 2012 to 2014 (HD2).
Republican

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Mark Dudenhefer vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/07/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (61-Y 35-N)
    02/07/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (61-Y 35-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/25/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (96-Y 2-N)
    01/25/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (96-Y 2-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/26/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (91-Y 8-N)
    01/26/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (91-Y 8-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/14/2017 - House: Senate substitute agreed to by House 17105185D-S1 (83-Y 15-N)
    02/14/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (83-Y 15-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

  • 01/24/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (82-Y 16-N)
    01/24/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (82-Y 16-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/26/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (93-Y 6-N)
    01/26/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (93-Y 6-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/23/2017 - House: Senate substitute agreed to by House 17105730D-S1 (61-Y 38-N)
    02/23/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (61-Y 38-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

  • 01/26/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (63-Y 36-N)
    01/26/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (63-Y 36-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 04/05/2017 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation #23 (30-Y 70-N)
    04/05/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (30-Y 70-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    No

  • 04/05/2017 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation #22 (24-Y 76-N)
    04/05/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (24-Y 76-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    No

  • 04/05/2017 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation #16 (35-Y 64-N)
    04/05/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (35-Y 64-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    No

  • 04/05/2017 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation #7 (34-Y 64-N 2-A)
    04/05/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (34-Y 64-N 2-A)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    No

  • 04/05/2017 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation #5 (33-Y 67-N)
    04/05/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (33-Y 67-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    No

  • 02/09/2017 - House: Motion to pass by amendment by Delegate Simon to Item 4-6.07 #1h agreed to (57-Y 40-N)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: PASS BY (57-Y 40-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

  • 02/09/2017 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 398 #4h agreed to (69-Y 30-N)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (69-Y 30-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

  • 02/09/2017 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 306 #1h agreed to (63-Y 33-N)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (63-Y 33-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

  • 02/09/2017 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 139 #2h agreed to (79-Y 18-N)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (79-Y 18-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

  • 02/09/2017 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 137 #3h agreed to (68-Y 30-N)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (68-Y 30-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

  • 02/09/2017 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 109 #1h agreed to (98-Y 1-N)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (98-Y 1-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/30/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (88-Y 10-N)
    01/30/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (88-Y 10-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/01/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (89-Y 8-N)
    02/01/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (89-Y 8-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/07/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (95-Y 2-N)
    02/07/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (95-Y 2-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.