Javascript is required to run this page

Mark Dudenhefer

Mark Dudenhefer served in the House of Delegates from 2016 to 2018 (HD2). Also served from 2012 to 2014 (HD2).
Republican

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Mark Dudenhefer vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus

95%


Other

5%



  • 01/18/2017 - House: Agreed to by House (57-Y 36-N)
    01/18/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (57-Y 36-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/30/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (57-Y 39-N)
    01/30/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (57-Y 39-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/15/2017 - House: Senate substitute rejected by House 17105323D-S1 (46-Y 54-N)
    02/15/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (46-Y 54-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/31/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (96-Y 1-N)
    01/31/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (96-Y 1-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/07/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (67-Y 28-N)
    02/07/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (67-Y 28-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2017 - House: Senate amendment agreed to by House (60-Y 34-N 1-A)
    02/20/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (60-Y 34-N 1-A)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/07/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (56-Y 41-N)
    02/07/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (56-Y 41-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/07/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (53-Y 44-N)
    02/07/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (53-Y 44-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2017 - House: Passed House with amendment (67-Y 32-N)
    02/22/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (67-Y 32-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2017 - House: Passed House (59-Y 40-N)
    02/22/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (59-Y 40-N)

    Mark Dudenhefer:
    No

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.