Javascript is required to run this page
Chad Green

Chad Green

Chad Green has served in the House of Delegates since 2024.
Republican
Currently represents House of Delegates District 69

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Chad Green vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus

90%


Other

10%



  • 02/18/2025 - Senate: Agreed to by Senate with substitute
    02/19/2025 - House: Senate substitute agreed to by House

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/04/2025 - House: Engrossed by House - committee substitute
    02/04/2025 - House: Agreed to by House (54-Y 44-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/03/2025 - House: Engrossed by House
    02/03/2025 - House: Agreed to by House (57-Y 39-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/03/2025 - House: Engrossed by House
    02/03/2025 - House: Agreed to by House (64-Y 31-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2025 - Senate: Agreed to by Senate with amendment by voice vote
    02/20/2025 - House: Senate Amendment agreed to by House (50-Y 45-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/03/2025 - House: Engrossed by House
    02/03/2025 - House: Agreed to by House (54-Y 43-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/03/2025 - House: Engrossed by House - committee substitute
    02/04/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (95-Y 4-N)

    Chad Green:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/27/2025 - House: Read second time and engrossed
    01/28/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (91-Y 7-N)

    Chad Green:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/03/2025 - House: Printed as engrossed 25105084D-EH1
    02/04/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (61-Y 38-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/03/2025 - House: Engrossed by House - committee substitute
    02/04/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (52-Y 47-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 4-1.01 #1h agreed to (50-Y 47-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 4-2.01 #1h agreed to (51-Y 45-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 489.30 #1h agreed to (51-Y 45-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item C-32.10 #1h agreed to (51-Y 46-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 471 #4h agreed to (51-Y 46-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 489.30 #1h agreed to (51-Y 45-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 471 #3h agreed to (49-Y 47-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 471 #4h agreed to (51-Y 46-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 394 #2h agreed to (50-Y 46-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 394 #3h agreed to (53-Y 43-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 377 #1h agreed to (48-Y 47-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 390 #1h agreed to (51-Y 45-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 277 #4h agreed to (51-Y 45-N 1-A)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 288 #1h agreed to (52-Y 44-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 277 #1h agreed to (97-Y 0-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 277 #4h agreed to (51-Y 45-N 1-A)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 236 #2h agreed to (88-Y 9-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 255 #1h agreed to (51-Y 45-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 236 #1h agreed to (80-Y 16-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 236 #2h agreed to (88-Y 9-N)

    Chad Green:
    Yes

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 103 #1h agreed to (50-Y 45-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 120 #1h agreed to (51-Y 45-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 102 #12h agreed to (97-Y 0-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 103 #1h agreed to (50-Y 45-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 86 #3h agreed to (62-Y 32-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 101 #5h agreed to (94-Y 3-N)

    Chad Green:
    Yes

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 51 #1h agreed to (50-Y 47-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 86 #3h agreed to (62-Y 32-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 35 #1h agreed to (97-Y 0-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 40 #2h agreed to (51-Y 46-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/06/2025 - House: Uncontested Committee amendments agreed to (97-Y 0-N)
    02/06/2025 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 7 #1h agreed to (53-Y 44-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

Bill Details
  • 04/02/2025 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation (11-Y 85-N)
    04/02/2025 - House: Motion to pass in enrolled form rejected (51-Y 44-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 03/24/2025 - Governor's recommendation received by House
    04/02/2025 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation (11-Y 85-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 02/21/2025 - Senate: Conference report agreed to by Senate (22-Y 13-N 1-A)
    02/22/2025 - House: Conference report agreed to by House (55-Y 44-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

  • 01/22/2025 - House: Printed as engrossed 25102219D-E
    01/23/2025 - House: Read third time and passed House (57-Y 40-N)

    Chad Green:
    No

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.