Javascript is required to run this page
Scott Lingamfelter

Scott Lingamfelter

Scott Lingamfelter served in the House of Delegates from 2002 to 2018 (HD31).
Republican

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Scott Lingamfelter vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/16/2017 - House: Senate substitute rejected by House 17105323D-S1 (49-Y 49-N)
    02/16/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (49-Y 49-N)

    Scott Lingamfelter:
    Yes

  • 02/15/2017 - House: Senate substitute rejected by House 17105323D-S1 (46-Y 54-N)
    02/15/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (46-Y 54-N)

    Scott Lingamfelter:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2017 - House: Senate amendment agreed to by House (60-Y 34-N 1-A)
    02/20/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (60-Y 34-N 1-A)

    Scott Lingamfelter:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2017 - House: Senate amendment agreed to by House (79-Y 13-N 1-A)
    02/20/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (79-Y 13-N 1-A)

    Scott Lingamfelter:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/07/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (78-Y 19-N)
    02/07/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (78-Y 19-N)

    Scott Lingamfelter:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/07/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (95-Y 1-N)
    02/07/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (95-Y 1-N)

    Scott Lingamfelter:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Senate substitute rejected by House 17105595D-S1 (1-Y 96-N)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (1-Y 96-N)

    Scott Lingamfelter:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2017 - House: Defeated by House (39-Y 56-N)
    02/20/2017 - House: VOTE: DEFEATED (39-Y 56-N)

    Scott Lingamfelter:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2017 - House: Defeated by House (46-Y 50-N)
    02/20/2017 - House: VOTE: DEFEATED (46-Y 50-N)

    Scott Lingamfelter:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.