Javascript is required to run this page
Danica Roem

Danica Roem

Danica Roem has served in the State Senate since 2024.
Also served in the House of Delegates from 2018 to 2024 (HD13).
Democrat
Currently represents State Senate District 30

Voting Unity: Democratic Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Danica Roem vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Democrats take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/10/2025 - Senate: Read third time
    02/10/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (35-Y 4-N)

    Danica Roem:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate as amended
    02/20/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendments (33-Y 6-N)

    Danica Roem:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/19/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate as amended
    02/19/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendment (36-Y 4-N)

    Danica Roem:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/18/2025 - Senate: Read third time
    02/18/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (31-Y 5-N)

    Danica Roem:
    No

Bill Details
  • 03/24/2025 - Governor's recommendation received by Senate
    04/02/2025 - Senate: Senate concurred in Governor's recommendation (23-Y 17-N)

    Danica Roem:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/27/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute
    01/28/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (37-Y 1-N)

    Danica Roem:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/27/2025 - Senate: Printed as engrossed 25104185D-E
    01/27/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (27-Y 11-N)

    Danica Roem:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/04/2025 - Senate: Rules suspended
    02/04/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (36-Y 4-N)

    Danica Roem:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2025 - House: Passed House with amendments (Y-58 N-39 A-0)
    02/20/2025 - Senate: House Amendments agreed to by Senate (37-Y 2-N)

    Danica Roem:
    No

  • 01/29/2025 - Senate: Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (SB1219)
    01/30/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (37-Y 2-N 1-A)

    Danica Roem:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/27/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate
    01/28/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (36-Y 3-N)

    Danica Roem:
    No

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.