Javascript is required to run this page
Schuyler VanValkenburg

Schuyler VanValkenburg

Schuyler VanValkenburg has served in the State Senate since 2024.
Also served in the House of Delegates from 2018 to 2024 (HD72).
Democrat
Currently represents State Senate District 16

Voting Unity: Democratic Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Schuyler VanValkenburg vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Democrats take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/18/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute
    02/18/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with substitute (24-Y 16-N)

    Schuyler VanValkenburg:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/10/2025 - Senate: Read third time
    02/10/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (35-Y 4-N)

    Schuyler VanValkenburg:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate as amended
    02/20/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendments (33-Y 6-N)

    Schuyler VanValkenburg:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/19/2025 - Senate: Read third time
    02/19/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (22-Y 17-N)

    Schuyler VanValkenburg:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/18/2025 - Senate: Read third time
    02/18/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (31-Y 5-N)

    Schuyler VanValkenburg:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/21/2025 - Senate: Read second time and engrossed
    01/22/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (30-Y 10-N)

    Schuyler VanValkenburg:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/03/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute
    02/04/2025 - Senate: Read third time and defeated by Senate (17-Y 22-N)

    Schuyler VanValkenburg:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/12/2025 - House: Passed House with substitute (86-Y 10-N)
    02/12/2025 - Senate: House substitute rejected by Senate (4-Y 33-N)

    Schuyler VanValkenburg:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/03/2025 - Senate: Reconsideration of passage agreed to by Senate
    02/03/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (31-Y 9-N)

    Schuyler VanValkenburg:
    No

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.