Javascript is required to run this page
Mark Peake

Mark Peake

Mark Peake has served in the State Senate since 2017.
Republican
Currently represents State Senate District 8

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Mark Peake vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/19/2025 - Senate: Reconsideration of House substitute agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
    02/19/2025 - Senate: House substitute agreed to by Senate (22-Y 18-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/04/2025 - Senate: Constitutional reading dispensed (on 3rd reading) (40-Y 0-N)
    02/04/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (39-Y 1-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/30/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute
    01/31/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (22-Y 18-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/27/2025 - Senate: Chair votes No
    01/27/2025 - Senate: Reconsideration of Passage agreed to (37-Y 1-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2025 - House: Passed House with amendments (56-Y 42-N)
    02/20/2025 - Senate: House Amendments agreed to by Senate (23-Y 16-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/03/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - floor substitute
    02/04/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (21-Y 18-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/12/2025 - House: Passed House with substitute (50-Y 47-N)
    02/14/2025 - Senate: House substitute agreed to by Senate (22-Y 14-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/04/2025 - Senate: Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (SB1133)
    02/04/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (21-Y 19-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/04/2025 - Senate: Rules suspended
    02/04/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (36-Y 4-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/04/2025 - Senate: Constitutional reading dispensed (on 3rd reading) (40-Y 0-N)
    02/04/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (34-Y 6-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.