Javascript is required to run this page
Mark Peake

Mark Peake

Mark Peake has served in the State Senate since 2017.
Republican
Currently represents State Senate District 8

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Mark Peake vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/18/2025 - House: Senate substitute rejected by House (0-Y 97-N)
    02/19/2025 - Senate: Senate insisted on substitute (36-Y 3-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/12/2025 - Senate: Reconsideration of Senate passage agreed to by Senate (39-Y 0-N)
    02/12/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendments (37-Y 2-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

  • 02/12/2025 - Senate: Committee amendments agreed to
    02/12/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendments (36-Y 2-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/18/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate as amended
    02/18/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendment (23-Y 16-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/12/2025 - Senate: Read third time
    02/12/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (37-Y 2-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/10/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate as amended
    02/10/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendment (23-Y 15-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/10/2025 - Senate: Read third time
    02/10/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (24-Y 14-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/18/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute
    02/18/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate with substitute (23-Y 17-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/14/2025 - Senate: Read third time
    02/14/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (26-Y 10-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/18/2025 - Senate: Read third time
    02/18/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (23-Y 16-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/17/2025 - Senate: Passed by for the day
    02/18/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (23-Y 17-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.