Javascript is required to run this page
Mark Peake

Mark Peake

Mark Peake has served in the State Senate since 2017.
Republican
Currently represents State Senate District 8

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Mark Peake vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 03/25/2025 - Senate: Governor's substitute printed (SB1212S2)
    04/02/2025 - Senate: Senate rejected Governor's recommendation (17-Y 23-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/25/2025 - Senate: Governor's substitute printed (SB1219S1)
    04/02/2025 - Senate: Senate rejected Governor's recommendation (18-Y 22-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

  • 02/20/2025 - House: Passed House with amendments (Y-58 N-39 A-0)
    02/20/2025 - Senate: House Amendments agreed to by Senate (37-Y 2-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

  • 01/29/2025 - Senate: Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (SB1219)
    01/30/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (37-Y 2-N 1-A)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/13/2025 - House: Passed House with substitute (56-Y 41-N)
    02/17/2025 - Senate: House substitute agreed to by Senate (37-Y 2-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2025 - House: Conference report agreed to by House (54-Y 40-N)
    02/22/2025 - Senate: Conference report agreed to by Senate (25-Y 15-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

  • 01/29/2025 - Senate: Passed by for the day
    01/30/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (24-Y 15-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/18/2025 - House: Passed House with amendment (50-Y 47-N)
    02/19/2025 - Senate: House Amendment agreed to by Senate (39-Y 1-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

  • 02/02/2025 - Senate: Fiscal Impact Statement from State Corporation Commission (SB1252)
    02/03/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (34-Y 6-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/03/2025 - Senate: Read second time and engrossed
    02/04/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (36-Y 3-N 1-A)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/13/2025 - House: Passed House with substitute (62-Y 33-N)
    02/17/2025 - Senate: House substitute agreed to by Senate (27-Y 12-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

  • 01/17/2025 - Senate: Committee substitute agreed to
    01/20/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (27-Y 13-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/10/2025 - House: Passed House with substitute (95-Y 0-N)
    02/12/2025 - Senate: House substitute rejected by Senate (2-Y 36-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/31/2025 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - floor substitute
    02/03/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (36-Y 4-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/27/2025 - Senate: Rules suspended
    01/27/2025 - Senate: Constitutional reading dispensed (on 1st reading) (37-Y 1-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.