Javascript is required to run this page
Mark Peake

Mark Peake

Mark Peake has served in the State Senate since 2017.
Republican
Currently represents State Senate District 8

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Mark Peake vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/10/2025 - House: Passed House with amendment (90-Y 5-N)
    02/12/2025 - Senate: House Amendment rejected by Senate (1-Y 38-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/17/2025 - Senate: Passed by for the day
    01/20/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (38-Y 2-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/04/2025 - Senate: Constitutional reading dispensed (on 3rd reading) (39-Y 0-N)
    02/04/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (39-Y 1-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/16/2025 - Senate: Passed by for the day
    01/17/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (38-Y 1-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/31/2025 - Senate: Read second time and engrossed
    02/03/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (37-Y 3-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2025 - House: Conference report agreed to by House (51-Y 45-N)
    02/21/2025 - Senate: Conference report agreed to by Senate (22-Y 18-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

  • 01/28/2025 - Senate: Reconsideration of (39-Y 0-N)
    01/28/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (23-Y 16-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

  • 01/28/2025 - Senate: Impact statement from VCSC (SB883)
    01/28/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (21-Y 17-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/18/2025 - House: Passed House with substitute (63-Y 33-N)
    02/19/2025 - Senate: House substitute agreed to by Senate (23-Y 15-N 1-A)

    Mark Peake:
    No

  • 01/21/2025 - Senate: Reconsideration of passage agreed to by Senate
    01/21/2025 - Senate: Passed Senate (25-Y 15-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

  • 01/21/2025 - Senate: Motion to rerefer to committee rejected (19-Y 21-N)
    01/21/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (23-Y 17-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 03/25/2025 - Senate: Governor's substitute printed (SB894S3)
    04/02/2025 - Senate: Senate rejected Governor's recommendation (4-Y 36-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2025 - House: Conference report agreed to by House (50-Y 46-N)
    02/21/2025 - Senate: Conference report agreed to by Senate (22-Y 18-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

  • 01/24/2025 - Senate: Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (SB897)
    01/24/2025 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (21-Y 17-N)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 03/24/2025 - Governor's recommendation received by Senate
    04/02/2025 - Senate: Senate concurred in Governor's recommendation (23-Y 17-N)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.