Javascript is required to run this page
Daun Hester

Daun Hester

Daun Hester served in the House of Delegates from 2012 to 2018 (HD89).
Democrat

Voting Unity: Democratic Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Daun Hester vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Democrats take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/24/2017 - House: Conference report agreed to by House (59-Y 36-N)
    02/24/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (59-Y 36-N)

    Daun Hester:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/25/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (68-Y 31-N)
    01/25/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (68-Y 31-N)

    Daun Hester:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 04/05/2017 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation #23 (30-Y 70-N)
    04/05/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (30-Y 70-N)

    Daun Hester:
    No

  • 04/05/2017 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation #22 (24-Y 76-N)
    04/05/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (24-Y 76-N)

    Daun Hester:
    No

  • 04/05/2017 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation #12 (24-Y 75-N)
    04/05/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (24-Y 75-N)

    Daun Hester:
    No

  • 04/05/2017 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation #11 (31-Y 68-N)
    04/05/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (31-Y 68-N)

    Daun Hester:
    No

  • 04/05/2017 - House: House rejected Governor's recommendation #10 (31-Y 69-N)
    04/05/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (31-Y 69-N)

    Daun Hester:
    No

  • 02/09/2017 - House: Contested committee amendment Item C-26 #1h agreed to (73-Y 25-N)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (73-Y 25-N)

    Daun Hester:
    Yes

  • 02/09/2017 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 436 #1h agreed to (73-Y 25-N 1-A)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (73-Y 25-N 1-A)

    Daun Hester:
    Yes

  • 02/09/2017 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 398 #4h agreed to (69-Y 30-N)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (69-Y 30-N)

    Daun Hester:
    Yes

  • 02/09/2017 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 295 #2h agreed to (66-Y 33-N)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (66-Y 33-N)

    Daun Hester:
    Yes

  • 02/09/2017 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 284 #1h agreed to (70-Y 28-N)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (70-Y 28-N)

    Daun Hester:
    Yes

  • 02/09/2017 - House: agreed to (69-Y 31-N)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (69-Y 31-N)

    Daun Hester:
    Yes

  • 02/09/2017 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 116 #1h agreed to (71-Y 29-N)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (71-Y 29-N)

    Daun Hester:
    Yes

  • 02/09/2017 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 106 #3h agreed to (74-Y 26-N)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (74-Y 26-N)

    Daun Hester:
    Yes

  • 02/09/2017 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 106 #1h agreed to (73-Y 27-N)
    02/09/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (73-Y 27-N)

    Daun Hester:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/25/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (96-Y 3-N)
    01/25/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (96-Y 3-N)

    Daun Hester:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2017 - House: Senate amendment rejected by House (1-Y 95-N)
    02/22/2017 - House: VOTE: REJECTED (1-Y 95-N)

    Daun Hester:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/24/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (67-Y 30-N 1-A)
    01/24/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (67-Y 30-N 1-A)

    Daun Hester:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/01/2017 - House: Read third time and passed House (93-Y 5-N)
    02/01/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (93-Y 5-N)

    Daun Hester:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2017 - House: Senate amendment agreed to by House (79-Y 13-N 1-A)
    02/20/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (79-Y 13-N 1-A)

    Daun Hester:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Senate amendment agreed to by House (95-Y 2-N)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (95-Y 2-N)

    Daun Hester:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Senate amendment agreed to by House (75-Y 21-N)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (75-Y 21-N)

    Daun Hester:
    No

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.