Javascript is required to run this page

Bill Stanley

Bill Stanley Jr has served in the State Senate since 2012. Also served from 2011 to 2012.
Republican
Currently represents State Senate District 7

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Bill Stanley vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/21/2024 - Senate: Read third time
    02/21/2024 - Senate: Passed Senate (36-Y 4-N)

    Bill Stanley:
    No

Bill Details
  • 03/05/2024 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate as amended
    03/05/2024 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendments (26-Y 14-N)

    Bill Stanley:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/23/2024 - Senate: Read third time
    02/23/2024 - Senate: Passed Senate (35-Y 4-N)

    Bill Stanley:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/26/2024 - Senate: Read third time
    02/26/2024 - Senate: Passed Senate (21-Y 18-N)

    Bill Stanley:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/04/2024 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute HB426S1
    03/04/2024 - Senate: Passed Senate with substitute (24-Y 16-N)

    Bill Stanley:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/04/2024 - Senate: Read third time
    03/04/2024 - Senate: Passed Senate (22-Y 18-N)

    Bill Stanley:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2024 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - floor substitute HB470S1
    02/21/2024 - Senate: Passed Senate with substitute (26-Y 14-N)

    Bill Stanley:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/23/2024 - Senate: Reconsideration of Senate passage agreed to by Senate (39-Y 0-N)
    02/23/2024 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendment (38-Y 1-N)

    Bill Stanley:
    No

Bill Details
  • 03/05/2024 - Senate: Read third time
    03/05/2024 - Senate: Passed Senate (25-Y 15-N)

    Bill Stanley:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/05/2024 - Senate: Read third time
    03/05/2024 - Senate: Passed Senate (22-Y 18-N)

    Bill Stanley:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.