House of Delegates District 100

Ches. Bay/Hampton Roads
Leans Republican
District Profile
Elections
Precinct Results
Redistricting

Partisan Lean of HD100 voters

Based on 2021 Governor's Race
Results are based on estimated absentee votes.
The state Department of Elections does not publish results by state legislative district. VPAP has developed what it believes to be reasonable estimates for calcuating the results by legislative district. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Republican Candidate
Glenn Youngkin 		18,485 57.96%
Democrat Candidate
Terry McAuliffe 		13,230 41.49%
Liberation Party Candidate
Princess Blanding 		166 0.52%
Election-Day Ballots Mapped by Precinct
The results on this map are incomplete and do not include an estimated 11,613 early ballots.
>+20D
0 to +20D
0 to +20R
>+20R
Accomack County
Election Day Votes: 64.2%
Early In-Person Votes: 30.6%
Mail Ballots: 5.2%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 7,877 61.08%
McAuliffe 4,948 38.37%
Blanding 68 0.53%
Actual results for Accomack County.
HD100 includes all of Accomack County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.


These are actual results for HD100.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 2,230 56.46%
Youngkin 1,708 43.24%
Blanding 13 0.33%

These are actual results for HD100.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 452 67.56%
Youngkin 209 31.24%
Blanding 8 1.20%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 983 74.58%
McAuliffe 326 24.73%
Blanding 8 0.61%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 418 86.72%
McAuliffe 62 12.86%
Blanding 2 0.41%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 687 81.69%
McAuliffe 151 17.95%
Blanding 3 0.36%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 424 65.43%
McAuliffe 218 33.64%
Blanding 6 0.93%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 282 81.03%
McAuliffe 65 18.68%
Blanding 1 0.29%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 370 78.72%
McAuliffe 100 21.28%
Blanding 0 0.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 129 85.43%
McAuliffe 21 13.91%
Blanding 1 0.66%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 158 57.25%
McAuliffe 112 40.58%
Blanding 5 1.81%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 115 55.83%
Youngkin 88 42.72%
Blanding 3 1.46%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 399 72.55%
McAuliffe 146 26.55%
Blanding 4 0.73%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 154 92.22%
McAuliffe 11 6.59%
Blanding 1 0.60%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 530 70.20%
McAuliffe 222 29.40%
Blanding 3 0.40%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 273 72.99%
McAuliffe 101 27.01%
Blanding 0 0.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 305 66.02%
McAuliffe 152 32.90%
Blanding 5 1.08%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 277 80.29%
McAuliffe 67 19.42%
Blanding 1 0.29%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 483 54.64%
McAuliffe 397 44.91%
Blanding 4 0.45%
Northampton County
Election Day Votes: 57.3%
Early In-Person Votes: 32.8%
Mail Ballots: 9.9%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 2,649 50.36%
McAuliffe 2,581 49.07%
Blanding 27 0.51%
Actual results for Northampton County.
HD100 includes all of Northampton County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.


These are actual results for HD100.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 940 54.49%
Youngkin 778 45.10%
Blanding 7 0.41%

These are actual results for HD100.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 376 72.17%
Youngkin 141 27.06%
Blanding 4 0.77%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 527 64.27%
McAuliffe 292 35.61%
Blanding 1 0.12%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 264 53.23%
Youngkin 226 45.56%
Blanding 5 1.01%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 286 59.09%
Youngkin 193 39.88%
Blanding 5 1.03%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 366 65.01%
McAuliffe 192 34.10%
Blanding 4 0.71%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 418 64.21%
McAuliffe 231 35.48%
Blanding 1 0.15%
Virginia Beach City
Election Day Votes: 65.4%
Early In-Person Votes: 23.1%
Mail Ballots: 11.5%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 7,959 57.95%
McAuliffe 5,701 41.51%
Blanding 71 0.52%
Estimated results for Virginia Beach City.
Virginia Beach City contains "split" precincts (*) for HD100. Explain
Virginia Beach City set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Virginia Beach City that falls within HD100.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,816 57.25%
McAuliffe 1,352 42.62%
Blanding 6 0.19%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 1,029 65.29%
Youngkin 532 33.76%
Blanding 14 0.89%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 490 63.23%
McAuliffe 278 35.87%
Blanding 7 0.90%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 796 63.78%
McAuliffe 446 35.74%
Blanding 5 0.40%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 489 65.11%
McAuliffe 257 34.22%
Blanding 5 0.67%

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 497 58.06%
McAuliffe 350 40.89%
Blanding 8 0.93%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 544 58.68%
McAuliffe 377 40.67%
Blanding 4 0.43%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 935 67.90%
McAuliffe 440 31.95%
Blanding 2 0.15%

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 134 67.34%
McAuliffe 65 32.66%
Blanding 0 0.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 496 59.83%
McAuliffe 326 39.32%
Blanding 7 0.84%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 701 57.70%
McAuliffe 508 41.81%
Blanding 5 0.41%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 529 65.31%
McAuliffe 273 33.70%
Blanding 8 0.99%
In order to calculate the number of votes within each precinct split between two or more districts, VPAP uses the proportion of voters within that portion of the precinct, which is provided by locality registrars on a monthly basis. If voter registration data is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use the proportion of voting age population within that portion of the precinct, calculated using Census block-level data.